PogoWasRight.org

Menu
  • About
  • Privacy
Menu

Revisions to cybersecurity bill incorporate more privacy protections

Posted on July 20, 2012 by pogowasright.org

Encouraging news:  both the ACLU and EFF say proposed amendments to the cybersecurity bill, S. 2105, address privacy concerns.

Michelle Richardson of the ACLU writes that the proposed changes would:

  • Ensure that companies who share cybersecurity information with the government give it directly to civilian agencies, and not to military agencies like the National Security Agency.  The single most important limitation on domestic cybersecurity programs is that they are civilian-run and do not turn the military loose on Americans and the internet.
  • Ensure that information shared under the program be “reasonably necessary” to describe a cybersecurity threat.
  • Restrict the government’s use of information it receives under the cyber info sharing authority so that it can be used only for actual cybersecurity purposes and to prosecute cyber crimes, protect people from imminent threat of death or physical harm, or protect children from serious threats.
  • Require annual reports from the Justice Department, Homeland Security, Defense and Intelligence Community Inspectors General that describe what information is received, who gets it, and what is done with it.
  • Allow individuals to sue the government if it intentionally or willfully violates the law.

Elsewhere, Rainey Reitman and Lee Tien of EFF also write that the revised bill, S. 3414, includes provisions:

  • Ensuring that only civilian agencies—not the National Security Agency—are in charge of our nation’s cybersecurity systems.
  • Ensuring data isn’t shared with law enforcement except in very specific, limited circumstances.
  • Ensuring that data collected through cybersecurity programs can’t be used to prosecute other, unrelated crimes.
  • Carve-outs for free speech and terms of service violations. The new privacy package makes it clear that Constitutionally-protected free speech and terms of service violations won’t constitute a “cybersecurity threat.”

Both organizations note that there are still remaining concerns that advocates will want to see addressed, but it does sound like there’s been some important progress.

Category: Featured NewsGovtLaws

Post navigation

← California to get tougher in enforcing online privacy
Chief Justice allows DNA samples from Maryland suspects →

Now more than ever

Search

Contact Me

Email: info@pogowasright.org

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Categories

Recent Posts

  • License Plate Reader Company Flock Is Building a Massive People Lookup Tool, Leak Shows
  • FTC dismisses privacy concerns in Google breakup
  • ARC sells airline ticket records to ICE and others
  • Clothing Retailer, Todd Snyder, Inc., Settles CPPA Allegations Regarding California Consumer Privacy Act Violations
  • US Customs and Border Protection Plans to Photograph Everyone Exiting the US by Car
  • Google agrees to pay Texas $1.4 billion data privacy settlement
  • The App Store Freedom Act Compromises User Privacy To Punish Big Tech

RSS Recent Posts on DataBreaches.net

  • Cyberattacks on Long Island Schools Highlight Growing Threat
  • Dior faces scrutiny, fine in Korea for insufficient data breach reporting; data of wealthy clients in China, South Korea stolen
  • Administrator Of Online Criminal Marketplace Extradited From Kosovo To The United States
  • Twilio denies breach following leak of alleged Steam 2FA codes
  • Personal information exposed by Australian Human Rights Commission data breach
©2025 PogoWasRight.org. All rights reserved.
Menu
  • About
  • Privacy