PogoWasRight.org

Menu
  • About
  • Privacy
Menu

People don’t want to trade privacy for targeted ads

Posted on January 14, 2016 by pogowasright.org

Rick Edmonds writes:

The Pew Research Center has released another in a series of studies of privacy issues with fresh evidence that consumers do not want to sacrifice personal information to get served targeted ads.

A separate study from the Annenberg School of Communications at the University of Pennsylvania, to be presented at a Federal Trade Commission conference today, finds many consumers resigned to their personal habits being harvested for commercial use. But they do not like it or buy the idea that it’s a fair tradeoff.

Read more on Poynter.org.

Category: BusinessOnline

Post navigation

← Data case has huge implications for personal privacy
Amash bill would repeal new cybersecurity law →

2 thoughts on “People don’t want to trade privacy for targeted ads”

  1. Joe Moore says:
    January 15, 2016 at 1:11 pm

    I just finished binge watching the videos from the FTC’s Privacy Con conference where the paper mentioned above was presented. During the conference every aspect of the “Notice and Choice” and “Privacy Policy” system of self regulation in the U.S. was rigorously proven to be a complete fraud. If the job of the FTC is to prevent unfair business practices, they now have no excuse to believe the following lie promulgated by the surveillance/manipulation (behavioral advertising) industry:

    That consumer profiling and tracking is OK with consumers because the privacy policies inform them of what happens and they are ok with it.

    What the research shows is that consumers hate being tracked but have been conditioned to not even read indecipherable Privacy Policies, and feel their only choice is to be a Luddite or give up all their privacy.

    So now the FTC knows officially what everyone who uses the internet has known for years. I can’t wait to see the deceptive practice settlements. Just kidding. I’m sure we’ll just see many more meetings where the “Stakeholders” explain why they believe having no privacy is not a harm.

    1. Dissent says:
      January 16, 2016 at 9:03 am

      Well said. Bravo! I thought some of the research presented at PrivCon should be an eye opener. But of course, it will only open the eyes of those who wish to see.

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

Search

Contact Me

Email: info@pogowasright.org

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Categories

Recent Posts

  • ARC sells airline ticket records to ICE and others
  • Clothing Retailer, Todd Snyder, Inc., Settles CPPA Allegations Regarding California Consumer Privacy Act Violations
  • US Customs and Border Protection Plans to Photograph Everyone Exiting the US by Car
  • Google agrees to pay Texas $1.4 billion data privacy settlement
  • The App Store Freedom Act Compromises User Privacy To Punish Big Tech
  • Florida bill requiring encryption backdoors for social media accounts has failed
  • Apple Siri Eavesdropping Payout Deadline Confirmed—How To Make A Claim

RSS Recent Posts on DataBreaches.net

  • Department of Justice says Berkeley Research Group data breach may have exposed information on diocesan sex abuse survivors
  • Masimo Manufacturing Facilities Hit by Cyberattack
  • Education giant Pearson hit by cyberattack exposing customer data
  • Star Health hacker claims sending bullets, threats to top executives: Reports
  • Nova Scotia Power hit by cyberattack, critical infrastructure targeted, no outages reported
©2025 PogoWasRight.org. All rights reserved.
Menu
  • About
  • Privacy