PogoWasRight.org

Menu
  • About
  • Privacy
Menu

Alberta’s Privacy Commissioner seeks leave to Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada

Posted on June 4, 2011July 2, 2025 by Dissent

The Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner of Alberta is evidently not happy at all with a recent ruling by the Alberta Court of Appeal and wants to challenge it. According to a June 1 press release from his office:

Information and Privacy Commissioner Frank Work has filed an Application for Leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada from a recent ruling of the Alberta Court of Appeal.

The Court of Appeal overturned a decision of the Commissioner’s Office related to the collection of personal information by Leon’s Furniture Ltd. There was a strong dissenting opinion.

Commissioner Work says the decision of the majority Court of Appeal seriously undermines the Personal Information Protection Act. “The decision could be used to challenge what were thought to be reasonable, nationally accepted limits on the collection of personal information by private sector organizations. We are moving backwards”.

Work adds, “This decision means that businesses can circumvent the intention of the legislation, and can decide, entirely on their own, what personal information they can collect. This puts our law at odds with laws in other jurisdictions such as British Columbia and Canada. It means that we are off side with the rest of Canada on the meaning of personal information, and that puts the people of Alberta at a disadvantage.”

The Commissioner believes the Court of Appeal ruling creates a dangerous precedent. “As we have seen from recent data breaches involving Sony and Honda along with Best Buy and Air Miles, personal information databases are a lucrative target for fraudsters. To the extent that this decision permits the overzealous and unregulated collection of Albertans’ personal information, it presents them a tempting target and means the consequences of a loss could be more severe. The stakes in this case are vital and significant for the privacy rights of Albertans and Canadians.”

Geoff Hall and Kara Smyth provide the background on the case and the recent Court of Appeal decision on Barry Sookman.

No related posts.

Category: BusinessCourtFeatured News

Post navigation

← Court Holds ECPA allows Myspace to Disclose Private Messages Pursuant to Out Of State Warrant
Editorial: Sometimes, the public doesn’t need to know →

Search

Contact Me

Email: info[at]pogowasright.org
Security Issue: security[at]pogowasright.org
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]pogowasright.org

Research Report of Note

A report by EPIC.org:

State Attorneys General & Privacy: Enforcement Trends, 2020-2024

Categories

Recent Posts

  • EU justice chief draws red line on privacy reforms
  • Kaiser Permanente to Pay Up to $47.5M in Web Tracker Lawsuit
  • How Palantir shifted course to play key role in ICE deportations
  • U.S. Judge Blocks Trump From Cutting Medicaid Funding For Planned Parenthood In 22 States
  • India backs off mandatory ‘cyber safety’ app after surveillance backlash
  • Judge orders Trump administration to halt warrantless immigration arrests in District of Columbia
  • EU court says websites on the hook for user privacy harms

RSS Recent Posts at DataBreaches.net

  • Marquis data breach impacts over 74 US banks, credit unions
  • Virginia Twins Arrested for Conspiring to Destroy Government Databases
  • Cyberattack on Puerto Rico IT vendor Truenorth hits 3 agencies
  • Easy Question, Complicated Answer: What Does It Take to Stop Workers From Snooping?
  • Update on Dos-OP’s report on Nova RaaS
©2025 PogoWasRight.org. All rights reserved.