PogoWasRight.org

Menu
  • About
  • Privacy
Menu

An Analysis of Google Logs Retention Policies

Posted on June 12, 2011July 2, 2025 by Dissent

Vincent Toubiana of Alcatel-Lucent Bell Labs and Helen Nissenbaum of New York University have published an article, “An Analysis of Google Logs Retention Policies,” in the Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality (2011): Vol. 3: Iss. 1, Article 2. Here’s the Abstract:

To preserve search log data utility, Google groups search queries in log bundles by deleting the last octet of logged IP address. Because these bundles still contain identifying information, part of these search logs can be de-anonymized [Jones et al., 2008]. Without an external audit of these search logs, it is currently impossible to evaluate their robustness against de-anonymizing attacks. In this paper, we leverage log retention policy ambiguities to show that quasi-identifiers could be stored in sanitized search query logs and could help to de-anonymize user searches. This paper refers to Google Search and Google Suggest log retention policies and shows that even with the highest degree of anonymization that Google offers, one could separate user queries with a high granularity. Because Google Suggest is queried every time a user types a character in the Google Chrome navigation box, the privacy of Chrome users could be compromised with respect to their browsing histories. Such ambiguities within log retention policies are critical and should be addressed, as anonymized logs could be shared with third parties without prior user consent.

You can download the article from CMU.

No related posts.

Category: BusinessFeatured NewsOnline

Post navigation

← Righthaven pressing for right to seize defendants’ websites, computers
UK: Marchioness launches ‘unusual’ privacy case →

Search

Contact Me

Email: info[at]pogowasright.org
Security Issue: security[at]pogowasright.org
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]pogowasright.org

Research Report of Note

A report by EPIC.org:

State Attorneys General & Privacy: Enforcement Trends, 2020-2024

Categories

Recent Posts

  • EU justice chief draws red line on privacy reforms
  • Kaiser Permanente to Pay Up to $47.5M in Web Tracker Lawsuit
  • How Palantir shifted course to play key role in ICE deportations
  • U.S. Judge Blocks Trump From Cutting Medicaid Funding For Planned Parenthood In 22 States
  • India backs off mandatory ‘cyber safety’ app after surveillance backlash
  • Judge orders Trump administration to halt warrantless immigration arrests in District of Columbia
  • EU court says websites on the hook for user privacy harms

RSS Recent Posts at DataBreaches.net

  • Marquis data breach impacts over 74 US banks, credit unions
  • Virginia Twins Arrested for Conspiring to Destroy Government Databases
  • Cyberattack on Puerto Rico IT vendor Truenorth hits 3 agencies
  • Easy Question, Complicated Answer: What Does It Take to Stop Workers From Snooping?
  • Update on Dos-OP’s report on Nova RaaS
©2025 PogoWasRight.org. All rights reserved.