PogoWasRight.org

Menu
  • About
  • Privacy
Menu

Bloomberg Law Not Impacted By Bloomberg Terminal Privacy Breach

Posted on May 14, 2013 by pogowasright.org

After the story broke about Bloomberg reporters being able to access traders’ use of its terminals, law professor James Grimmelman tweeted:

Bloomberg Law’s privacy policy doesn’t prohibit sharing users’ searches with Bloomberg journalists. That’s a client confidences problem.

— James Grimmelmann (@grimmelm) May 11, 2013

It’s not clear to me that attorneys can use Bloomberg Law without risking disciplinary sanctions for putting client confidences at risk.

— James Grimmelmann (@grimmelm) May 11, 2013

According to Dewey B Strategic, they can rest assured:

No Impact at Bloomberg Law. According to Greg McCaffery, CEO of Bloomberg Law, reporters have no access to the Bloomberg Law user data. Bloomberg Law resides on a separate cloud platform, not on the same platform as the Bloomberg terminal data. Bloomberg law doesn’t even have the same “command” functions which the reporters used to access customer data. He also pointed out that the Bloomberg BNA reporters who write the Bloomberg BNA newsletters have no access to the customer data. McCaffery stated that “Bloomberg Law takes the privacy of its customer data very seriously. To be clear: no journalists at Bloomberg News or BNA have ever had access to customer research activity on Bloomberg Law.”

The fact is that there are law firms which subscribe to Bloomberg business terminals under separate contracts from Bloomberg Law, so presumably reporters were also able to view the limited account activity described above. The Bloomberg business terminals are generally used by researchers and not law firm partners, but we now have assurance that reporters can not access any law firm Bloomberg terminal usage.

Category: Breaches

Post navigation

← Government obtains wide AP phone records in leak probe
A Saudi Arabia Telecom’s Surveillance Pitch →

Now more than ever

Search

Contact Me

Email: [email protected]

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Categories

Recent Posts

  • Your household smart products must respect your privacy – including your air fryer
  • Vermont signs Kids Code into law, faces legal challenges
  • Data Categories and Surveillance Pricing: Ferguson’s Nuanced Approach to Privacy Innovation
  • Anne Wojcicki Wins Bidding for 23andMe
  • Would you — or wouldn’t you?
  • New York passes a bill to prevent AI-fueled disasters
  • Synthetic Data and the Illusion of Privacy: Legal Risks of Using De-Identified AI Training Sets

RSS Recent Posts on DataBreaches.net

  • Major trial underway for data leak that left 72,000 victims in France
  • Anubis: A Closer Look at an Emerging Ransomware with Built-in Wiper
  • HealthEC Agrees to $5.48 Million Settlement to End Data Breach Lawsuit
  • US offering $10 million for info on Iranian hackers behind IOControl malware
  • Sompo Japan Insurance submits improvement plan after info leakage
©2025 PogoWasRight.org. All rights reserved.