PogoWasRight.org

Menu
  • About
  • Privacy
Menu

California Assembly Passes Digital Privacy Bill with Strong Bipartisan Support

Posted on September 9, 2015June 26, 2025 by Dissent

In a tremendous victory for the electronic privacy rights of all Californians, the California Assembly today passed the California Electronic Privacy Act (CalECPA, SB 178) with strong support from Republicans and Democrats. The bill, jointly authored by Senator Mark Leno, D-San Francisco, and Senator Joel Anderson, R-Alpine, protects Californians against warrantless government access to private electronic communications such as emails, text messages and GPS data that are stored in the cloud and on smart phones, tablets, laptops and other digital devices. The bill passed the Assembly with a 56-11 bipartisan vote, and now returns to the Senate for concurrence before heading to Gov. Brown’s desk.

“While technology has advanced exponentially, California’s communications laws are stuck in the Dark Ages, leaving our personal emails, text messages, photos and smartphones increasingly vulnerable to warrantless searches,” said Senator Leno. “CalECPA was carefully crafted to ensure that the personal information of Californians of all ages is adequately protected and our law enforcement has the tools they need to fight crime in the digital age. The bill strikes just the right balance to protect privacy, spur innovation and safeguard public safety.”

“Senator Leno and I bridge the gap between progressives and conservatives to put Californians first and reinforce our constitutional protections,” said Senator Anderson. “Our bipartisan bill protects Californians’ basic civil liberties as the Fourth Amendment and the California Constitution intended.”

SB 178 requires law enforcement to get a warrant before accessing an individual’s electronic information and includes thoughtful exceptions for law enforcement to use in the event of emergencies and other public safety needs. California’s statewide law enforcement groups, including the Sheriffs Association, District Attorneys Association and Police Chiefs Association are neutral on the bill.

“Now is the time for Governor Brown to sign CalECPA into law and update California’s privacy laws for the modern digital age,” said Nicole Ozer, Technology & Civil Liberties Policy Director at the ACLU of California, a co-sponsor of the bill. “Californians overwhelmingly want to see change and make sure police get a warrant before accessing our private emails, text messages, and tracking our cell phones. CalECPA makes sure this happens.”

The bill has support from Silicon Valley’s major tech companies, including Google, Apple, Facebook and Twitter and moves toward Gov. Brown’s desk at a particularly important time. The state’s technology companies have seen a dramatic rise in requests from law enforcement for consumer data. Google has seen a 180 percent jump in law enforcement demands for consumer data in just the past five years. Last year, AT&T received 64,000 demands – a 70 percent increase in a single year. Verizon reports that only one-third of its requests had a warrant, and last year Twitter and Tumblr received more demands from California than any other state.

“California has led the nation in technological innovation for decades. Now it’s time for our laws to catch up. Californians deserve warrant protection for their digital records,” said Lee Tien, Senior Staff Attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

According to recent statewide polling, voters across all age groups, geographic regions and party affiliation are overwhelmingly concerned about their digital privacy. When it comes to accessing e-mail and Internet activity, 82 percent of voters support requiring a warrant prior to authorities gaining access. Similarly, nearly 79 percent support a warrant requirement for tracking cell phones and what you do on it, and 77 percent support warrants for accessing text messaging records.

“The California Newspaper Publishers Association urges support of SB 178, which safeguards a newspaper’s ability to gather and report news by protecting journalists and their sources from unwarranted surveillance,” said Nikki Moore, CNPA Staff Attorney.

If Governor Brown signs SB 178 into law, California would join states as diverse as Texas, Virginia, Maine, and Utah that have already updated their privacy laws for the digital age and now require proper judicial oversight, including a warrant, for access to sensitive digital information.

CalECPA is co-sponsored by the American Civil Liberties Union of California, the Electronic Frontier Foundation and the California Newspaper Publishers Association. The bill is supported by more than a dozen technology businesses and numerous national and statewide civil liberties, civil rights, and consumer organizations. The diverse coalition of supporters also includes Adobe, Apple, Asian Americans Advancing Justice, Center for Media Justice, Centro Legal de la Raza, Color of Change, Common Sense Kids Action, Consumer Action, Consumer Federation, Council on American-Islamic Relations, Dropbox, Facebook, Foursquare, Google, Internet Archive, the Internet Association, LinkedIn, Media Alliance, NameCheap, National Center for Lesbian Rights, Privacy Rights Clearinghouse, reddit, Restore the 4th, Techfreedom, Twitter, The Utility Reform Network, and the World Privacy Forum.

SOURCE: ACLU of Northern California

Related posts:

  • In Landmark Victory for Digital Privacy, Gov. Brown Signs California Electronic Communications Privacy Act into Law
Category: LawsSurveillanceU.S.

Post navigation

← Apple and Other Tech Companies Tangle With U.S. Over Data Access
License to connive: Boston still tracks vehicles, lies about it, and leaves sensitive resident data exposed →

Search

Contact Me

Email: info[at]pogowasright.org
Security Issue: security[at]pogowasright.org
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]pogowasright.org

Research Report of Note

A report by EPIC.org:

State Attorneys General & Privacy: Enforcement Trends, 2020-2024

Categories

Recent Posts

  • Lawmakers Warn Governors About Sharing Drivers’ Data with Federal Government
  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation
  • Who’s watching the watchers? This Mozilla fellow, and her Surveillance Watch map

RSS Recent Posts at DataBreaches.net

  • Suspected Russian hacker reportedly detained in Thailand, faces possible US extradition
  • Did you hear the one about the ransom victim who made a ransom installment payment after they were told that it wouldn’t be accepted?
  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
©2025 PogoWasRight.org. All rights reserved.