PogoWasRight.org

Menu
  • About
  • Privacy
Menu

CIPL Publishes Discussion Paper Comparing U.S. State Privacy Law Definitions of Personal Data and Sensitive Data

Posted on November 19, 2025 by Dissent

Hunton Andrews Kurth writes:

On November 12, 2025, the Centre for Information Policy Leadership (“CIPL”) at Hunton published a discussion paper titled “Comparing U.S. State Privacy Laws: Covered and Sensitive Data” (“Discussion Paper”), the latest in its discussion paper series comparing key elements of U.S. state privacy laws.

The concepts of personal data – and the types of personal data categorized as “sensitive” – are foundational elements of U.S. state privacy laws and regulations. However, the criteria for what qualifies as “sensitive” – and the legal consequences that follow – are not always aligned across U.S. state privacy laws. As a result, organizations are tasked with operationalizing varying definitions across a fragmented and inconsistent legal landscape.

The Discussion Paper analyzes the scope, applicability, exemptions and key definitions of “personal data” and “sensitive” data under comprehensive U.S. state privacy laws. It examines the most common approaches, as well as outliers, with a focus on three topics:

  1. The concept of personal data (or “personal information”) (including an analysis of exclusions such as “deidentified” and “publicly available” data)
  2. The definition of “sensitive data” (or “sensitive personal information”)
  3. Relevant exemptions

Read more at Privacy & Information Security Law Blog.

Direct link to their Discussion Paper.

No related posts.

Category: Featured NewsLawsU.S.

Post navigation

← India’s Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023 brought into force
Researchers claim ‘largest leak ever’ after uncovering WhatsApp enumeration flaw →

Search

Contact Me

Email: info[at]pogowasright.org
Security Issue: security[at]pogowasright.org
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]pogowasright.org

Research Report of Note

A report by EPIC.org:

State Attorneys General & Privacy: Enforcement Trends, 2020-2024

Categories

Recent Posts

  • EU justice chief draws red line on privacy reforms
  • Kaiser Permanente to Pay Up to $47.5M in Web Tracker Lawsuit
  • How Palantir shifted course to play key role in ICE deportations
  • U.S. Judge Blocks Trump From Cutting Medicaid Funding For Planned Parenthood In 22 States
  • India backs off mandatory ‘cyber safety’ app after surveillance backlash
  • Judge orders Trump administration to halt warrantless immigration arrests in District of Columbia
  • EU court says websites on the hook for user privacy harms

RSS Recent Posts at DataBreaches.net

  • Marquis data breach impacts over 74 US banks, credit unions
  • Virginia Twins Arrested for Conspiring to Destroy Government Databases
  • Cyberattack on Puerto Rico IT vendor Truenorth hits 3 agencies
  • Easy Question, Complicated Answer: What Does It Take to Stop Workers From Snooping?
  • Update on Dos-OP’s report on Nova RaaS
©2025 PogoWasRight.org. All rights reserved.