PogoWasRight.org

Menu
  • About
  • Privacy
Menu

Company which made 75 million nuisance automated calls in four months is fined by the ICO

Posted on January 17, 2018July 1, 2025 by Dissent

I really wish entities here who make nuisance automated calls despite your phone number being on the DoNotCall list were fined like this.  From the office of the U.K.’s Information Commissioners:

A company which made 75 million nuisance calls in four months has been fined £350,000 by the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO).

Miss-sold Products UK Ltd made the automated marketing calls between 16 November 2015 and 7 March 2016. The calls contained recorded messages, primarily promoting PPI compensation claims, but the company did not have the recipients’ consent for making marketing calls, which is against the law.

It also broke the law by failing to identify the organisation making the calls, while it used so-called ‘added value’ numbers that generate revenue when an individual calls the number, which is then apportioned and passed to associated companies and the network carrier.

The ICO received 146 complaints from the public about Miss-sold Products. Some people were called on multiple occasions. Others said they were unable to opt out of receiving the calls. Some expressed further distress as they were concerned that calls late at night may have been from family members or those to whom they provided care.

The director of Miss-sold – which had its registered office in Milford Haven, Wales, before it was moved in 2017 to Darlington, County Durham – had applied to strike it off the Companies House Register but the ICO has blocked the move pending enforcement action. This is to allow all options to be considered for recovery of the penalty, and for the actions of the director in running the company to be fully scrutinised.

ICO Enforcement Group Manager Andy Curry said:

“This company blatantly ignored the laws on telephone marketing, making a huge volume of intrusive calls over a short period of time and without any apparent attempt to ensure they had the consent of the people they were harassing.

“The ICO will come down hard on rogue operators who want to treat the law and the UK public with contempt. We hope the Government will bring forward plans to introduce personal liability for directors as a matter of urgency, to stop them from escaping punishment after profiting from nuisance calls and texts.

“In the absence of a change in the law, the ICO will continue to face challenges in the recovery of penalties, and rogue directors will think they can get away with causing nuisance to members of the public.”

Some of the complaints received from the public about Miss-sold Products were as follows:

  • “As I receive a call from this number almost daily, it has become an intrusive and unwelcome interruption.”
  • “I have been receiving calls from this number for many months, sometimes every day. I feel trapped in being unable to end the disruption to my attention and intrusion on my privacy. Calls are coming from two separate numbers.”
  • “I receive at least two calls a day, normally more, from these PPI companies, despite the fact I always block the number as soon as I receive a call from one. This means my details are continuously being sold and it makes me very anxious and annoyed to know this is happening to my personal information without my consent.”
  • “I am a carer and when I get evening calls I am anxious that it may be connected to the person I care for. It is an unwelcome interruption.”
  • “We have been receiving calls for several months from this number, they call twice a day playing the same messages and even pressing 9 does not stop the calls, despite the promise to remove our number. It is very inconvenient and frustrating we are unable to opt out.”

No related posts.

Category: BusinessNon-U.S.

Post navigation

← Fast food restaurants to use facial recognition to spy on customers
EPIC Comments on Maryland “Smart Meter” Privacy Bill →

Search

Contact Me

Email: info[at]pogowasright.org
Security Issue: security[at]pogowasright.org
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: Dissent.73
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]pogowasright.org

Research Report of Note

A report by EPIC.org:

State Attorneys General & Privacy: Enforcement Trends, 2020-2024

Categories

Recent Posts

  • PRIVACY—S.D. Cal.: Employee did not waive privacy right in personal email data on company provided laptop, (Dec 5, 2025)
  • EU justice chief draws red line on privacy reforms
  • Kaiser Permanente to Pay Up to $47.5M in Web Tracker Lawsuit
  • How Palantir shifted course to play key role in ICE deportations
  • U.S. Judge Blocks Trump From Cutting Medicaid Funding For Planned Parenthood In 22 States
  • India backs off mandatory ‘cyber safety’ app after surveillance backlash
  • Judge orders Trump administration to halt warrantless immigration arrests in District of Columbia

RSS Recent Posts at DataBreaches.net

  • UK Government Considers Computer Misuse Act Revision
  • Japan issues arrest warrant against teen suspected of cyberattack using AI
  • How old is the average hacker? What does a new research report suggest? (1)
  • Marquis data breach impacts over 74 US banks, credit unions
  • Virginia Twins Arrested for Conspiring to Destroy Government Databases
©2025 PogoWasRight.org. All rights reserved.