PogoWasRight.org

Menu
  • About
  • Privacy
Menu

Criminal complaint against facial recognition company Clearview AI in Austria

Posted on October 29, 2025 by Dissent

From nyob:

Today, noyb has filed a criminal complaint against Clearview AI and its managers. The facial recognition company is known for scraping billions of photos of Europeans and people around the world on the internet – and selling its facial recognition system to law enforcement and state actors. Several EU data protection authorities have already imposed fines and bans on Clearview AI. But the US company simply ignores these actions – given the lack of enforcement.

  • Original Complaints against Clearview filed in 2021
  • Decision of Austrian DPA deeming Clearview illegal
  • Several Clearview fines:
    • Fine by French DPA
    • Fine by Greek DPA
    • Fine by Italian DPA
    • Fine by Dutch DPA
    • Fine by UK DPA

Background. Clearview AI is a US company that scrapes the internet and adds all of the faces it can find in photos and videos to its database. It claims to have collected more than 60 billion photos. This allows customers of Clearview AI to identify people by uploading a photo and obtaining other pictures of the same person, including links, the name of a subpage of a website and other meta data. The company originally tried to operate largely under the radar but the New York Times revealed its practices in 2020. While Clearview AI primarily promotes its facial recognition software as a tool for law enforcement, it was also used by companies such as Walmart or Bank of America.

Max Schrems: “Facial recognition technology is extremely invasive. It allows for mass surveillance and immediate identification of millions of people. Clearview AI amassed a global database of photos and biometric data, which makes it possible to identify people within seconds. Such power is extremely concerning and undermines the idea of a free society, where surveillance is the exception instead of the rule.”

Read more at NYOB.

h/t, Joe Cadillic

No related posts.

Category: Artificial IntelligenceBreachesBusinessCourtNon-U.S.

Post navigation

← US Law Overrides State Bans on Medical Debt Reporting, CFPB Says
ICE and CBP Agents Are Scanning Peoples’ Faces on the Street To Verify Citizenship →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search

Contact Me

Email: info[at]pogowasright.org
Security Issue: security[at]pogowasright.org
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]pogowasright.org

Research Report of Note

A report by EPIC.org:

State Attorneys General & Privacy: Enforcement Trends, 2020-2024

Categories

Recent Posts

  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation
  • Who’s watching the watchers? This Mozilla fellow, and her Surveillance Watch map
  • EPIC Publishes New Whitepaper Detailing Privacy Risks of Government Data Mining Programs
  • Modern cars are spying on you. Here’s what you can do about it.
  • Attorney General James and Multistate Coalition Secure $5.1 Million from Education Software Company for Failing to Protect Students’ Data       
  • EU Parliament committee votes to advance controversial Europol data sharing proposal

RSS Recent Posts at DataBreaches.net

  • Short-term renewal of cyber information sharing law appears in bill to end shutdown
  • Yanluowang ransomware IAB pleads guilty
  • Lawsuit Alleges Ex-Intel Employee Hid 18,000 Sensitive Documents Prior to Leaving the Company
  • HIPAA, but for non-Covered Entities?
  • Manassas City Public Schools close on Monday due to cyberattack
©2025 PogoWasRight.org. All rights reserved.