PogoWasRight.org

Menu
  • About
  • Privacy
Menu

DNA tests a hot holiday item despite privacy concerns

Posted on December 16, 2017June 25, 2025 by Dissent

Carol Ann Alaimo reports:

One of this year’s hottest holiday gifts has privacy advocates worried.

In Tucson and elsewhere, sales of home DNA testing kits are soaring, spurred by discount pricing and ubiquitous TV ads that promise users insights into their family heritage.

But the saliva tests can also reveal propensities for diseases, and critics fear users may be putting their medical privacy at risk by providing genetic information to companies that can’t guarantee it will remain anonymous.

Count me among the privacy advocates who are concerned about these kits – and not just for the very good reasons listed above. As I watched a TV ad that showed family members greeting each with percent of shared DNA flashed on the screen, I wondered how this will play out when someone discovers that they do NOT share DNA with the people they always believed they shared DNA with. What will happen when someone suddenly discovers that perhaps they were adopted? What will happen when someone suddenly discovers that a child’s “grandfather” is their father and not their grandfather? Yeah, it can get ugly and make for a not-so-merry Christmas.

There are down sides to these kits, and I wish there was more discussion of the privacy risks and concerns – not just the risk of de-anonymizing or breaches, although those concerns are huge, but all these other concerns as well.

Read more on Tucson.com.

Related posts:

  • DNA Dragnet: In Some Cities, Police Go From Stop-and-Frisk to Stop-and-Spit
Category: BusinessHealthcareU.S.

Post navigation

← Russian website streaming hundreds of cameras in Canada, experts warn your connected devices could be at risk
Privacy Commissioner Releases Two Reports and Encourages Organizations to Nurture the Culture of “Protect and Respect Personal Data Privacy” →

1 thought on “DNA tests a hot holiday item despite privacy concerns”

  1. Joe says:
    December 19, 2017 at 8:42 am

    So I guess this means, I should return that DNA Christmas present I got you?

Comments are closed.

Search

Contact Me

Email: info[at]pogowasright.org
Security Issue: security[at]pogowasright.org
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: Dissent.73
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]pogowasright.org

Research Report of Note

A report by EPIC.org:

State Attorneys General & Privacy: Enforcement Trends, 2020-2024

Categories

Recent Posts

  • U.S. Plans to Scrutinize Foreign Tourists’ Social Media History
  • ANNOUNCEMENT: EFF Launches Age Verification Hub as Resource Against Misguided Laws
  • FTC Denies Petition from SpyFone App CEO to Vacate 2021 Order
  • Privacy concerns raised as Grok AI found to be a stalker’s best friend
  • PRIVACY—S.D. Cal.: Employee did not waive privacy right in personal email data on company provided laptop, (Dec 5, 2025)
  • EU justice chief draws red line on privacy reforms
  • Kaiser Permanente to Pay Up to $47.5M in Web Tracker Lawsuit

RSS Recent Posts at DataBreaches.net

  • Village of Golf Manor considering paying ransom amid cyberattack (1)
  • Teen who allegedly stole millions of personal data records arrested in Spain
  • Akira ransomware: FBI tallies 250 million in payouts
  • IE: HSE confirms second ransomware attack but ‘no evidence’ patient data was stolen
  • Examining impact of federal relief program after major healthcare cyberattack — Research Brief
©2025 PogoWasRight.org. All rights reserved.