PogoWasRight.org

Menu
  • About
  • Privacy
Menu

EFF Argues Against Forced Unlocking of Phone in Indiana Supreme Court

Posted on April 16, 2019June 25, 2025 by Dissent

Wabash, IN—At 10 a.m. on Thursday, April 18, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) will argue to the Indiana Supreme Court that police cannot force a criminal suspect to turn over a passcode or otherwise decrypt her cell phone. The case is Katelin Seo v. State of Indiana.

The Fifth Amendment of the Constitution states that people cannot be forced to incriminate themselves, and it’s well settled that this privilege against self-incrimination covers compelled “testimonial” communications, including physical acts. However, courts have split over how to apply the Fifth Amendment to compelled decryption of encrypted devices.

Along with the ACLU, EFF responded to an open invitation from the Indiana Supreme Court to file an amicus brief in this important case. In Thursday’s hearing, EFF Senior Staff Attorney Andrew Crocker will explain that the forced unlocking of a device requires someone to disclose “the contents of his own mind.” That is analogous to written or oral testimony, and is therefore protected under the U.S. Constitution.

Thursday’s hearing is in Indiana’s Wabash County to give the public an opportunity to observe the work of the court. Over 750 students are scheduled to attend the argument. It will also be live-streamed.

WHAT:
Hearing in Katelin Seo v. State of Indiana

WHO:
EFF Senior Staff Attorney Andrew Crocker

WHEN:
April 18, 10 a.m.

WHERE:
Ford Theater
Honeywell Center
275 W. Market Street
Wabash, Indiana 46992

For more information on attending the argument in Wabash:
https://www.in.gov/judiciary/supreme/2572.htm

For more on this case:
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2019/02/highest-court-indiana-set-decide-if-you-can-be-forced-unlock-your-phone

Contact: Andrew Crocker

Source: EFF

Related posts:

  • Is EFF defending corporations from people whose lives have been RUINED, like attorney Carrie Goldberg claims? Part 2 (EFF’s Response)
Category: CourtFeatured NewsSurveillanceU.S.

Post navigation

← Police Use Drones To Spy On Suspicious People At “Potential Crime Scenes”
The Coming Regulation of Artificial Intelligence? EU Publishes AI Guidelines →

Search

Contact Me

Email: info[at]pogowasright.org
Security Issue: security[at]pogowasright.org
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: Dissent.73
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]pogowasright.org

Research Report of Note

A report by EPIC.org:

State Attorneys General & Privacy: Enforcement Trends, 2020-2024

Categories

Recent Posts

  • End-of-Year 2025 State and Federal Developments in Minors’ Privacy
  • Tool allows stealthy tracking of Signal and WhatsApp users through delivery receipts
  • Oh Great, Smart Glasses That Record Everything You Say
  • CBP Agents Held This U.S. Citizen for Hours Until He Agreed To Let Them Search His Electronic Devices
  • U.S. Plans to Scrutinize Foreign Tourists’ Social Media History
  • ANNOUNCEMENT: EFF Launches Age Verification Hub as Resource Against Misguided Laws
  • FTC Denies Petition from SpyFone App CEO to Vacate 2021 Order

RSS Recent Posts at DataBreaches.net

  • Google and Apple roll out emergency security updates after zero-day attacks
  • Doxers Posing as Cops Are Tricking Big Tech Firms Into Sharing People’s Private Data
  • Virginia Urology Silent on Possible Data Breach as Purported Patient Data Begins to Leak
  • Village of Golf Manor considering paying ransom amid cyberattack (1)
  • Teen who allegedly stole millions of personal data records arrested in Spain
©2025 PogoWasRight.org. All rights reserved.