PogoWasRight.org

Menu
  • About
  • Privacy
Menu

FPF’s 2020 Student Privacy Pledge: New Pledge, Similar Problems

Posted on September 30, 2021June 24, 2025 by Dissent

EFF legal intern Rob Ferrari was the lead author of this post by Sophia Cope, Jason Kelley, and Bill Budington:

A new school year has started, the second one since the pandemic began. With our education system becoming increasingly reliant on the use of technology (“edtech”), especially for remote learning during the pandemic, protecting student privacy is more important than ever. Unfortunately, the Future of Privacy Forum’s 2020 Student Privacy Pledge, like the legacy version, continues to provide schools, parents, and students with false assurance due to numerous loopholes for the edtech company signatories that collect and use student data.

The Future of Privacy Forum (FPF) originally launched the Student Privacy Pledge in 2014 to encourage edtech companies to take voluntary steps to protect the privacy of K-12 students. In 2016, we criticized the Legacy Pledge after it reached 300 signatories—to FPF’s dismay.

The 2020 Pledge once again falls short in how it defines material terms, such as “Student PII” and “School Service Providers”; many of the 2020 Pledge’s commitments are conditioned on school or parent/student consent, which may inadequately protect student privacy; and new commitments are insufficiently precise.

Read more on EFF.

PogoWasRight.org reached out to the FPF to ask if they had a response to EFF’s commentary.  FPF’s VP of Youth & Education Privacy, Amelia Vance, had this to say:

The Student Privacy Pledge has been effective and widely adopted by school districts and companies because it takes key requirements in state and federal laws and presents them in simple terms that can be understood by parents, teachers, and schools. It has also created new enforcement opportunities for advocates and Attorneys General who have used the Pledge to take action against vendors.

Related posts:

  • Future of Privacy Forum Releases New Student Privacy Communications Toolkit
  • Is EFF defending corporations from people whose lives have been RUINED, like attorney Carrie Goldberg claims? Part 2 (EFF’s Response)
Category: BusinessU.S.Youth & Schools

Post navigation

← ‘Stalkerware’ apps are proliferating. Protect yourself.
OCR Issues Guidance on HIPAA, COVID-19 Vaccinations, and the Workplace →

Now more than ever

Search

Contact Me

Email: info@pogowasright.org

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Categories

Recent Posts

  • White House ordered to restore Medicaid funding to Planned Parenthood clinics
  • California Attorney General Announces $1.55M CCPA Settlement with Healthline.com
  • Canada’s Bill C-2 Opens the Floodgates to U.S. Surveillance
  • Wiretap Suits Pit Old Privacy Laws Against New AI Technology
  • Action against tiny Scottish charity sparks huge ICO row
  • Congress tries to outlaw AI that jacks up prices based on what it knows about you
  • Microsoft’s controversial Recall feature is now blocked by Brave and AdGuard

RSS Recent Posts on DataBreaches.net

  • Minnesota National Guard deployed; St. Paul declares state of emergency in response to cyberattack
  • Scattered Spider Hijacks VMware ESXi to Deploy Ransomware on Critical U.S. Infrastructure
  • Hacker group “Silent Crow” claims responsibility for cyberattack on Russia’s Aeroflot
  • AIIMS ORBO Portal Vulnerability Exposing Sensitive Organ Donor Data Discovered by Researcher
  • Two Data Breaches in Three Years: McKenzie Health
©2025 PogoWasRight.org. All rights reserved.
Menu
  • About
  • Privacy