PogoWasRight.org

Menu
  • About
  • Privacy
Menu

Google changes privacy policy after threat of €15M fine

Posted on July 9, 2015June 26, 2025 by Dissent

Janene Van Jaarsveldt reports:

Google has improved its privacy policy after the Dutch Data Protection Authority threatened the company with a 15 million euro fine, the Authority reported on Thursday.

According to the Authority, google has already applied a number of the suggested measures, AD reports. The internet giant has updated the information on its privacy policy and now also asks new users’ permission to combine their personal data throughout Google services.

Google’s not totally out of the woods yet, though. Read more on NL Times.

A statement on the Dutch Data Protection Authority site explains:

As a result of an incremental penalty payment imposed by the Dutch Data Protection Authority (Dutch DPA) Google has partly ended earlier established infringements on the privacy of individuals. The Dutch DPA had imposed this incremental penalty payment regarding Google’s new privacy policy. The company has now adapted the information in its privacy policy following the demands of the Dutch DPA. Furthermore Google started a privacy campaign. Google intends to end the remaining infringement by informing people about the use of their personal data and by asking them for their informed consent. Google has until the end of December 2015 to obtain the unambiguous consent of all of its users step by step. In the coming months the Dutch DPA will monitor whether this will be done properly and will also verify if the privacy infringement will indeed be ended.

Infringements

The results of the investigation by the Dutch DPA, which were published earlier, showed that Google combines personal data of internet users, to, amongst others, display personal ads. This combining occurred without Google adequately informing the users in advance and without the company asking for their consent. This is in violation of the law.

The practice of combining personal data does not only involve people that are logged in to a Google account, but also people that use Google’s search engine, or visit a (third party) website that places or reads cookies from Google. Data about for example search queries, location data, video’s watched and e-mails sent and received can be combined with each other, while those services serve very different purposes.

Measures

The Dutch DPA had imposed an incremental penalty payment on Google that could amount to 15 million euros. Following this, Google has taken several of the measures demanded by the Dutch DPA. For example, Google has adapted the information in its privacy policy and clarifies that YouTube is a Google service. Google now also asks new users that create a Google account for consent to combine their personal data.

During a legal procedure started by Google, appealing against the incremental penalty payment imposed, the Dutch DPA partly revoked the imposed incremental penalty payment for the  remaining infringement by extending the deadline within which Google has to obtain unambiguous consent of all of its users to the end of December.

This means that all users of Google services must have had the opportunity to give their unambiguous consent for the combining of their personal data not later than by the end of December 2015.

If Google does not properly obtain consent, the company risks a penalty payment of 5 million euros. For the moment, Google does not need to make any penalty payments.

No related posts.

Category: BusinessNon-U.S.

Post navigation

← On the passing of a great privacy advocate
Dutch Government Moves To Let Intelligence Community Have More Hacking & Mass Surveillance Powers →

Search

Contact Me

Email: info[at]pogowasright.org
Security Issue: security[at]pogowasright.org
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]pogowasright.org

Research Report of Note

A report by EPIC.org:

State Attorneys General & Privacy: Enforcement Trends, 2020-2024

Categories

Recent Posts

  • Lawmakers Warn Governors About Sharing Drivers’ Data with Federal Government
  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation
  • Who’s watching the watchers? This Mozilla fellow, and her Surveillance Watch map

RSS Recent Posts at DataBreaches.net

  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
©2025 PogoWasRight.org. All rights reserved.