PogoWasRight.org

Menu
  • About
  • Privacy
Menu

Govt says EFF “very much overreacted” to request for delay in Jewel v. NSA in light of Snowden disclosures

Posted on June 21, 2013July 1, 2025 by Dissent

Earlier this month, I noted that the government had sought a delay in Jewel v. NSA following revelations in The Guardian about surveillance programs. I haven’t seen EFF’s response to the government’s notice and request, but it would appear that EFF did not agree, and on Wednesday, the government filed a response to EFF’s opposition that begins:

On June 7, 2013, the Government Defendants notified the Court that, in response to media reports about alleged surveillance activities, the Director of National Intelligence (“DNI”) had, the day before, directed that certain information related to the “business records” provision of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (“FISA”) be declassified and immediately released to the public. Recognizing that this official disclosure could affect the Government’s pending state secrets privilege assertion, the Government Defendants asked the Court to pause its consideration of that assertion, briefed in the parties’ pending cross-motions for summary judgment, while the Government Defendants determined the impact of the disclosure on the privilege assertion. We indicated in our notice that we would consult with plaintiffs about the way forward during this pause, but plaintiffs opposed the notice before any substantive consultation could take place. See Dkt. 143, Plaintiffs’ Opposition (“Pl. Opp.”).

Plaintiffs have very much overreacted to the Government’s notice. They erroneously accuse the Government of seeking to delay proceedings and propose an order for further proceedings that we believe would be inappropriate at this stage.

Read more on Courthouse News. I expect EFF will have more to say on this when they have time.

Related posts:

  • Is EFF defending corporations from people whose lives have been RUINED, like attorney Carrie Goldberg claims? Part 2 (EFF’s Response)
Category: CourtSurveillanceU.S.

Post navigation

← New documents reveal parameters of NSA’s secret surveillance programs
Spain launches sanction proceedings against Google over privacy concerns →

Search

Contact Me

Email: info[at]pogowasright.org
Security Issue: security[at]pogowasright.org
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]pogowasright.org

Research Report of Note

A report by EPIC.org:

State Attorneys General & Privacy: Enforcement Trends, 2020-2024

Categories

Recent Posts

  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation
  • Who’s watching the watchers? This Mozilla fellow, and her Surveillance Watch map
  • EPIC Publishes New Whitepaper Detailing Privacy Risks of Government Data Mining Programs
  • Modern cars are spying on you. Here’s what you can do about it.
  • Attorney General James and Multistate Coalition Secure $5.1 Million from Education Software Company for Failing to Protect Students’ Data       
  • EU Parliament committee votes to advance controversial Europol data sharing proposal

RSS Recent Posts at DataBreaches.net

  • NHS providers reviewing stolen Synnovis data published by cyber criminals
  • Gates Down: Third Circuit Says Breaking Employer Computer Access Policies Is Not Hacking
  • Short-term renewal of cyber information sharing law appears in bill to end shutdown
  • Yanluowang ransomware IAB pleads guilty
  • Lawsuit Alleges Ex-Intel Employee Hid 18,000 Sensitive Documents Prior to Leaving the Company
©2025 PogoWasRight.org. All rights reserved.