PogoWasRight.org

Menu
  • About
  • Privacy
Menu

ICO issues £200,000 fine for unsolicited text messages

Posted on October 27, 2015June 26, 2025 by Dissent

Help Direct UK Ltd, a Swansea-based lead generation company has been fined £200,000 by the ICO for sending out thousands of unsolicited marketing text messages.

A marketing campaign run by the company in April 2015 prompted 6,758 complaints in just one month. People complained about a variety of messages offering services including the reclaim of PPI payments, bank refunds and loans. A typical text read: “Its been signed off, we have 3886.41 in your name for the accident you had, for us to put in your bank Now just fill out www.accidentinjuryclaim.so”

One complainant to the ICO explained they had never had an accident and was worried someone may be fraudulently using their identity. Another was concerned they may have unknowingly caused an accident.

An ICO investigation discovered that Help Direct UK was using unregistered SIM cards to send the messages, a common practice by companies looking to avoid the mobile networks’ spam detectors.

Anne Jones, Assistant Commissioner for Wales said:

“This was a marketing campaign on a massive scale from a company who has already been warned by us to stop sending these marketing messages.

“Help Direct has deliberately broken the law by continuing to send these messages, which is why the company has received the first monetary penalty under our new powers.

“The company has also shown a blatant disregard for the rules by ignoring enforcement action we issued earlier this year. They are now facing the consequences of that decision.

“Help Direct’s actions are unacceptable and we will act to stop companies behaving in this way. We have the power to prosecute anyone ignoring our enforcement notices and, as well as the fine, Help Direct can expect even more action from us.”

The ICO issued an enforcement notice seven months ago ordering Help Direct to stop sending marketing texts after a previous investigation showed it had sent 187,960 messages in 2014, many offering pension reviews. Mobile phones and devices used by the company in the past were linked to the current investigation. Breaching an enforcement notice is a criminal offence and the ICO is now considering further action.

A change in the law makes it easier for the ICO to issue fines to companies that break the law. Previously, the ICO has had to prove that a company caused ‘substantial damage or substantial distress’ to individuals by making nuisance calls or sending spam text messages. But from April 2015, the ICO just has to prove that the company was committing a serious breach of the Privacy and Electronic Communication Regulations (PECR); either the breach was deliberate or the company knew or ought to have known that there was a risk that the contravention would occur; and the company failed to take reasonable steps to prevent it. This is the first fine under these new rules.

Spam texts can be reported to the ICO or to a network operator by sending them, free of charge, to ‘7726’. The networks are also working to block the worst offenders.

The ICO has published detailed guidance for companies carrying out marketing – explaining their legal requirements under the Data Protection Act and the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations. The guidance covers the circumstances in which organisations are able to carry out marketing over the phone, by text, by email, by post or by fax.

SOURCE: Information Commissioner’s Office

No related posts.

Category: BreachesNon-U.S.

Post navigation

← Rights groups and tech companies ask NY Court of Appeals to overturn bulk warrant issued to Facebook for user information
SA Supreme Court rules Dr Janice Duffy was defamed by Google through its hyperlinks, auto-complete and search engine results →

Search

Contact Me

Email: info[at]pogowasright.org
Security Issue: security[at]pogowasright.org
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]pogowasright.org

Research Report of Note

A report by EPIC.org:

State Attorneys General & Privacy: Enforcement Trends, 2020-2024

Categories

Recent Posts

  • Lawmakers Warn Governors About Sharing Drivers’ Data with Federal Government
  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation
  • Who’s watching the watchers? This Mozilla fellow, and her Surveillance Watch map

RSS Recent Posts at DataBreaches.net

  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
©2025 PogoWasRight.org. All rights reserved.