PogoWasRight.org

Menu
  • About
  • Privacy
Menu

Justice Stevens and the so-called right to privacy

Posted on May 22, 2010 by pogowasright.org

Erin Miller writes:

The following essay by Jamal Greene is part of our thirty-day series on John Paul Stevens.  Greene clerked for Justice Stevens during the 2006 Term, and is now a law professor at Columbia University.

In the months leading up to his confirmation hearing, news emerged that in 1981, as a fledgling lawyer in the Reagan Justice Department, John Roberts had referred to the “so-called” right to privacy. This was thought to be code for opposition to Roe v. Wade, and Roberts’s views on abortion rights were tested early and often; indeed, Senator Arlen Specter, then the Republican chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee and a supporter of abortion rights, began the hearing by confronting Roberts with the memo.

The phrase “so-called right to privacy” is not original to Roberts. So far as I am aware, its first juridical use was in Roberson v. Rochester Folding Box Co., a 1902 New York Court of Appeals case involving allegedly tortious appropriation of the (unsuccessful) plaintiff’s likeness in order to sell flour. Judge Alton Parker referred to the then-nascent privacy tort, which was birthed in a now-famous 1890 Harvard Law Review article by Samuel Warren and Louis Brandeis. Judge Parker was perhaps even less impressed than the current Chief Justice:

Read more on SCOTUSBlog.

Photo credit:  Charles Dharapak/ Associated Press

Category: CourtFeatured News

Post navigation

← Facebook likely headed to court over privacy concerns, critics say
AG Corbett’s Office Withdraws Twitter Subpoena →

Now more than ever

Search

Contact Me

Email: [email protected]

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Categories

Recent Posts

  • Vermont signs Kids Code into law, faces legal challenges
  • Data Categories and Surveillance Pricing: Ferguson’s Nuanced Approach to Privacy Innovation
  • Anne Wojcicki Wins Bidding for 23andMe
  • Would you — or wouldn’t you?
  • New York passes a bill to prevent AI-fueled disasters
  • Synthetic Data and the Illusion of Privacy: Legal Risks of Using De-Identified AI Training Sets
  • States sue to block the sale of genetic data collected by DNA testing company 23andMe

RSS Recent Posts on DataBreaches.net

  • Resource: State Data Breach Notification Laws – June 2025
  • WestJet investigates cyberattack disrupting internal systems
  • Plastic surgeons often store nude photos of patients with their identity information. When would we call that “negligent?”
  • India: Servers of two city hospitals hacked; police register FIR
  • Ph: Coop Hospital confirms probe into reported cyberattack
©2025 PogoWasRight.org. All rights reserved.