PogoWasRight.org

Menu
  • About
  • Privacy
Menu

Location Tracking and Biometrics

Posted on March 4, 2013July 1, 2025 by Dissent

If you missed the conference on Location Tracking and Biometrics at Yale yesterday, you missed an outstanding conference combining informative presentations and lively discussion and questions from the audience.  But not to fear: it’s available for viewing (fast forward the first 40 minutes; it seems to start with Chris Soghoian’s overview of location tracking).

You can find the program here, with links to articles suggested by panelists. There were four panels:

Panel 1: The Fourth Amendment and tracking after U.S. v. Jones with Susan Freiwald, David Gray, Chief Judge Alex Kozinski, Priscilla Smith  (Moderator: Jameel Jaffer)
Panel 2: Cellular phones and mobile privacy: Government requests to carriers  with Kevin Bankston, Ed McNicholas, Stephanie Pell, Judge Stephen Smith (Moderator Barton Gellman)
Panel 3: Cellular phones and mobile privacy: Direct government surveillance (Stingrays) with Alan Butler, Judge Brian Owsley, Christopher Soghoian (Moderator Jennifer Valentino-DeVries)
Panel 4: Nontrespassory tracking: Biometrics, license plate readers, and drones with Alvaro Bedoya, Catherine Crump, Laura K. Donohue, Ralph Gross, Travis Hall, Jennifer Lynch, Nabiha Syed (Moderator Noah Shachtman)

There was just so much packed into the panel presentations and discussions that I can’t do it justice here, other than to just tell you:  go watch and listen. You’ll thank me later, although the fourth panel may scare the bejesus out of you.

@EFFaustin provided yeoman service throughout the day, tweeting links to additional relevant articles and resources on the topics.  I’ve compiled a list of  some of the many tweets, which includes their suggestions as well as some resources tweeted by others:

Ars Technica: 30,000 secret surveillance orders approved each year, judge estimates
H.B. 1608, introduced in Texas legislature: “Relating to warrants issued to obtain location information from wireless communications devices and to public access to law enforcement or prosecutor requests for certain related location or communication information.” See also this post.
David Gray, Danielle Citron: The Right to Quantitative Privacy
Police blotter: Judge lets Feds track cell phones
Google, Microsoft, Yahoo, and Facebook say they require warrants to give over private content
MobileLUMAscape
Microsoft launches ‘Don’t get Scroogled’ campaign against Google
Heritage Foundation: New National Counterterrorism Center Guidelines Require Strong Oversight
Electronic Surveillance Manual (2005)
Purchase agreement to buy Stingray
FOI response on Stingray
Forum thread: IMSI Catcher/Spy Detector
NY v. Bialstock
Jennifer Lynch: From Fingerprints to DNA: Biometric Data Collection in U.S. Immigrant Communities and Beyond
DHS: Privacy Impact Assessment for the Automated Biometric Identification System (IDENT) (2006)
FBI: The Integrated Automated Fingerprint Identification System (IAFIS)
Laura Donahue: Technological Leap, Statutory Gap, and Constitutional Abyss: Remote Biometric Identification Comes of Age
Alessandro Acquisti, Ralph Gross, Fred Stutzman: Faces of Facebook: Privacy in the Age of Augmented Reality
CV Dazzle, camouflage from face detection
Stanford University drone-list

 

No related posts.

Category: CourtFeatured NewsLawsSurveillanceU.S.

Post navigation

← Warrantless silent video recording in suspect’s home, even if confidential informant invited in, was an unreasonable search – Court
K-12 student database jazzes tech startups, spooks parents →

Search

Contact Me

Email: info[at]pogowasright.org
Security Issue: security[at]pogowasright.org
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]pogowasright.org

Research Report of Note

A report by EPIC.org:

State Attorneys General & Privacy: Enforcement Trends, 2020-2024

Categories

Recent Posts

  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation
  • Who’s watching the watchers? This Mozilla fellow, and her Surveillance Watch map
  • EPIC Publishes New Whitepaper Detailing Privacy Risks of Government Data Mining Programs
  • Modern cars are spying on you. Here’s what you can do about it.
  • Attorney General James and Multistate Coalition Secure $5.1 Million from Education Software Company for Failing to Protect Students’ Data       
  • EU Parliament committee votes to advance controversial Europol data sharing proposal

RSS Recent Posts at DataBreaches.net

  • NHS providers reviewing stolen Synnovis data published by cyber criminals
  • Gates Down: Third Circuit Says Breaking Employer Computer Access Policies Is Not Hacking
  • Short-term renewal of cyber information sharing law appears in bill to end shutdown
  • Yanluowang ransomware IAB pleads guilty
  • Lawsuit Alleges Ex-Intel Employee Hid 18,000 Sensitive Documents Prior to Leaving the Company
©2025 PogoWasRight.org. All rights reserved.