PogoWasRight.org

Menu
  • About
  • Privacy
Menu

Maybe we should call it the Cryptome Rule?

Posted on March 5, 2010July 3, 2025 by Dissent

Seen in the Federal Register, March 3, from the Department of Defense:

SUMMARY: DoD is seeking comments from Government and industry on potential changes to the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to address requirements for the safeguarding of
unclassified information. The changes would add a new subpart and associated contract clauses for the safeguarding, proper handling, and cyber intrusion reporting of unclassified DoD information within industry.

[…]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This ANPR and notice of public meeting is a preliminary step in the rulemaking process for DFARS Case 2008-D028 that may be followed by issuance of a proposed rule in the future. The DFARS presently does not address the safeguarding of unclassified DoD information within industry, nor does it address cyber intrusion reporting for that information. The purpose of the potential DFARS changes addressed in this ANPR is to implement adequate security measures to safeguard DoD information on unclassified industry information systems from unauthorized access and disclosure, and to
prescribe reporting to the Government with regard to certain cyber intrusion events that affect DoD information resident or transiting on contractor unclassified information systems. This ANPR does not address
procedures for Government sharing of cyber security threat information with industry; this issue will be addressed separately through follow-on rulemaking procedures as appropriate. These changes to the DFARS
address requirements for the safeguarding of unclassified information and may be altered as necessary to align with any future direction given in response to on-going efforts currently being led by the National Archives and Records Administration regarding Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI).

No related posts.

Category: Laws

Post navigation

← Class Says Internet Dating Site Loots Their Address Books
Privacy protection essential in fight against cybercriminals, experts say →

Now more than ever

Search

Contact Me

Email: info@pogowasright.org

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Categories

Recent Posts

  • Navigating Privacy Gaps and New Legal Requirements for Companies Processing Genetic Data
  • Germany’s top court holds that police can only use spyware to investigate serious crimes
  • Flightradar24 receives reprimand for violating aircraft data privacy rights
  • Nebraska Attorney General Sues GM and OnStar Over Alleged Privacy Violations
  • Federal Court Allows Privacy Related Claims to Proceed in a Proposed Class Action Lawsuit Against Motorola
  • Italian Garante Adopts Statement on Health Data and AI
  • Trump administration is launching a new private health tracking system with Big Tech’s help

RSS Recent Posts on DataBreaches.net

  • Updating: Two Telegram channels and two accounts banned, one bounty offered, and BreachForums goes down
  • North Korean Kimsuky Hackers Suffer Data Breach as Insiders Leak Information Online
  • Hackers post stolen St. Paul data online as efforts to reset city employee passwords surge forward
  • Justice Department Announces Coordinated Disruption Actions Against BlackSuit (Royal) Ransomware Operations
  • NL: Hackers breach cancer screening data of almost 500,000 women
©2025 PogoWasRight.org. All rights reserved.
Menu
  • About
  • Privacy