PogoWasRight.org

Menu
  • About
  • Privacy
Menu

More reactions to “Best Practices Act”

Posted on July 23, 2010July 3, 2025 by Dissent

The Federal Trade Commission today testified about FTC efforts to protect consumer privacy and commented on legislative proposals to improve privacy protections before the U.S. House Subcommittee on Commerce, Trade, and Consumer Protection of the Committee on Energy and Commerce.

The testimony presented by David Vladeck, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, described the FTC’s law enforcement actions to hold companies accountable for protecting consumer privacy, focusing on data security, identity theft, children’s privacy, and protecting consumers from intrusive spam, spyware, and telemarketing. The testimony noted that the FTC has brought 28 actions charging businesses with failing to protect consumers’ personal information and 15 actions charging website operators with collecting information from children without parents’ consent. The FTC also has brought 15 spyware cases and dozens of actions challenging illegal spam, including an action against a rogue Internet Service Provider that resulted in a temporary 30 percent drop in spam worldwide. Finally, the FTC has brought 64 actions alleging violations of the Do Not Call Rule, resulting in violators paying almost $40 million in civil penalties and giving up nearly $18 million, including consumer redress.

The testimony also described the FTC’s consumer and business education efforts, cross-border privacy and international enforcement work, and research and policymaking on emerging technology issues, including privacy roundtables held in 2009-10. In addition, the testimony discussed legislative proposals from Subcommittee Chairmen Bobby L. Rush and Rick Boucher. The testimony supported the proposals’ provisions giving the FTC rulemaking authority under the Administrative Procedures Act. It also stated that if privacy legislation is enacted, Congress should consider requiring simplified disclosures to help consumers make timely choices and compare privacy protections offered by different companies.

Source: Federal Trade Commission

Of course, not everyone is happy with the proposed legislation, including the Interactive Advertising Bureau.  Declan McCullagh covers their reaction on cnet.

No related posts.

Category: BusinessLawsU.S.

Post navigation

← Privacy Bill Contention Evident at House Hearing
Safari autofill exploit can reveal user data →

Now more than ever

Search

Contact Me

Email: info@pogowasright.org

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Categories

Recent Posts

  • Congress tries to outlaw AI that jacks up prices based on what it knows about you
  • Microsoft’s controversial Recall feature is now blocked by Brave and AdGuard
  • Trump Administration Issues AI Action Plan and Series of AI Executive Orders
  • Indonesia asked to reassess data privacy terms in new U.S. trade deal
  • Meta Denies Tracking Menstrual Data in Flo Health Privacy Trial
  • Wikipedia seeks to shield contributors from UK law targeting online anonymity
  • British government reportedlu set to back down on secret iCloud backdoor after US pressure

RSS Recent Posts on DataBreaches.net

  • Scattered Spider Hijacks VMware ESXi to Deploy Ransomware on Critical U.S. Infrastructure
  • Hacker group “Silent Crow” claims responsibility for cyberattack on Russia’s Aeroflot
  • AIIMS ORBO Portal Vulnerability Exposing Sensitive Organ Donor Data Discovered by Researcher
  • Two Data Breaches in Three Years: McKenzie Health
  • Scattered Spider is running a VMware ESXi hacking spree
©2025 PogoWasRight.org. All rights reserved.
Menu
  • About
  • Privacy