PogoWasRight.org

Menu
  • About
  • Privacy
Menu

Ninth Circuit orders anonymous internet speakers be identified

Posted on July 14, 2010July 3, 2025 by Dissent

Evan Brown provides a summary of and commentary on a Ninth Circuit opinion issued yesterday concerning outing online anonymous speakers.

From the court’s opinion (pdf), the background on the case:

The proceeding before us is but a short chapter in an acrimonious and long-running business dispute between Quixtar, Inc. (“Quixtar”), successor to the well-known Amway Corporation, and Signature Management TEAM, LLC (“TEAM”). Quixtar sued TEAM, claiming that TEAM orchestrated an Internet smear campaign via anonymous postings and videos disparaging Quixtar and its business practices. As part of the discovery process, Quixtar sought testimony from Benjamin Dickie, a TEAM employee, regarding the identity of five anonymous online speakers who allegedly made defamatory comments about Quixtar. Dickie refused to identify the anonymous speakers on First Amendment grounds. The district court ordered Dickie to disclose the identity of three of the five speakers.

The Anonymous Online Speakers seek a writ of mandamus directing the district court to vacate its order regarding the identity of the three speakers. Quixtar cross-petitions for a writ of mandamus directing the district court to order Dickie to testify regarding the identity of the anonymous speakers from the remaining two sources. Because neither party has established that it is entitled to the extraordinary remedy of mandamus, we deny both petitions.

As Brown points out:

This is a significant case on the topic of anonymity because it is only the third federal circuit opinion to consider the question as to when unknown online speakers should be identified. The others are NLRB v. Midland Daily News (6th Cir. 1998) and Lefkoe v. Jos. A. Bank Clothiers, (4th Cir. 2009).

Via LawandLit

No related posts.

Category: CourtOnline

Post navigation

← Article: The Fourth Amendment Right To Delete
EFF Urges Court to Block Dragnet Subpoenas Targeting Online Commenters →

Now more than ever

Search

Contact Me

Email: info@pogowasright.org

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Categories

Recent Posts

  • Navigating Privacy Gaps and New Legal Requirements for Companies Processing Genetic Data
  • Germany’s top court holds that police can only use spyware to investigate serious crimes
  • Flightradar24 receives reprimand for violating aircraft data privacy rights
  • Nebraska Attorney General Sues GM and OnStar Over Alleged Privacy Violations
  • Federal Court Allows Privacy Related Claims to Proceed in a Proposed Class Action Lawsuit Against Motorola
  • Italian Garante Adopts Statement on Health Data and AI
  • Trump administration is launching a new private health tracking system with Big Tech’s help

RSS Recent Posts on DataBreaches.net

  • Violent Crypto Crimes Surge in 2025 Amid Massive Data Leaks
  • Why Ransomware Attacks Are Decreasing in 2025
  • KR: Yes24, the largest Internet bookstore in Korea, suffered its second ransomware attack in two months
  • Korea wins world’s top hacking contest for 4th consecutive year
  • 7-Zip Vulnerability Lets Hackers Write Files and Run Malicious Code
©2025 PogoWasRight.org. All rights reserved.
Menu
  • About
  • Privacy