PogoWasRight.org

Menu
  • About
  • Privacy
Menu

Now what is this all about?

Posted on September 17, 2013July 1, 2025 by Dissent

Reading Cryptome this morning, I came across this item:

From: Bo Chen <bochen7e7[at]live.com>
To: “cryptome[at]earthlink.net” <cryptome[at]earthlink.net>
Subject: Cryptome : Help, I’ve been charged with a crime for using encryption, please make this into a news story!
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 09:38:00 -0500

I’m being wrongfully charged with a crime by the Addison PD in Dallas county for merely using encryption on a work computer even though after I was abruptly terminated on false allegations of theft and after I was coerced into writing a check to the owner, the police later came back and said it was a crime to use encryption, even after I already offered and the police agreed to give me the chance to unlock it for the owner. This can’t be right. Please see if you can link to it as an article or something to get this publicity and warn other people that something so innocent could get them in so much trouble in our police state!

My website I created to report this injustice!

http://www.innocentbeyondareasonabledoubt.com

After spending a few minutes on  his web site trying to understand what had transpired, all I had for my efforts was a headache. I’m not sure if there is any workplace privacy issue here or not, nor what the legal issues might be. It seems that the former contract worker had encrypted some of his personal files on the computer (he claims he had permission to have his own files on the computer), and that after he was terminated, he did not have a chance to clear his files off the computer, where they remained encrypted. Of course, it’s not clear how the employer could know that these were (allegedly) personal files if they were encrypted.

Is this strictly a civil issue that hinges on any contract or agreement between the firm and the contractor, or is there a criminal law issue here, too, under Texas law or CFAA?

No related posts.

Category: U.S.Workplace

Post navigation

← FTC Seeks Public Comment on kidSAFE’s Proposed Safe Harbor Program Under the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Rule
Swedish school told to halt Google cloud service →

Search

Contact Me

Email: info[at]pogowasright.org
Security Issue: security[at]pogowasright.org
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]pogowasright.org

Research Report of Note

A report by EPIC.org:

State Attorneys General & Privacy: Enforcement Trends, 2020-2024

Categories

Recent Posts

  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation
  • Who’s watching the watchers? This Mozilla fellow, and her Surveillance Watch map
  • EPIC Publishes New Whitepaper Detailing Privacy Risks of Government Data Mining Programs

RSS Recent Posts at DataBreaches.net

  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
©2025 PogoWasRight.org. All rights reserved.