Libbie Canter & Elizabeth Brim of Covington and Burling write: 2024 was an incredibly busy year for health privacy. As the year draws to a close and we look ahead to 2025, we share several areas that we are watching in the coming year, which we expect to be similarly busy with federal- and state-level…
EPIC, Coalition Urge EU Council to Reconsider Proposals That Would Undermine Encryption
From the good folks at EPIC: EPIC, along with 54 other civil society organizations, industry, and professional associations, wrote a letter to the European Union’s Justice and Home Affairs Council, warning them of the dangers of undermining encryption for further law enforcement access to data. The High-Level Group on Access to Data for Effective Law Enforcement, also…
Texas accuses data broker specializing in driver behavior of privacy law violations
Suzanne Smalley reports: Texas’ attorney general has accused the data broker Arity, which sells individual drivers’ behavior data to insurers, of sharing consumers’ information without clear notice or consent. The case is the latest Texas action highlighting how data protections can get murky when consumers use apps that track their behavior. In the past six weeks, six…
Facial recognition and privacy: Updated OAIC guidance
Lisa Fitzgerald and Steven Li of Norton Rose Fulbright write: The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC) has issued guidance to private sector organisations who are considering using facial recognition technology (FRT) for identification purposes in commercial or retail settings. The guidance follows a determination of the Privacy Commissioner which found that the use…