PogoWasRight.org

Menu
  • About
  • Privacy
Menu

Police shouldn’t get to choose to disregard privacy laws

Posted on January 6, 2013July 1, 2025 by Dissent

David T. S. Fraser writes:

Victoria lawyer Michael Mulligan has an interesting opinion piece in today’s Victoria Times Colonist about the recent fuss over the city police’s disregard of privacy laws.

For those who are just tuning in, the Information and Privacy Commissioner recently did a review of the practice of automated license plate scanning. She found that the collection, retention and possible re-use of the data violated the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act.

Local Sannich police stopped the practice. The Mayor of Victoria urged the police to follow the OIPC’s ruling, but the police board met in secret and decided to continue the practice.

Read more on Canadian Privacy Law Blog. It seems that law enforcement deciding that they can do what they want to despite the rule of law knows no national bounds.  At least in Canada, the police seem to be upfront about it. Here, we have “secret laws” and may have no idea how we are being surveilled.  They’re both unacceptable, but which is worse?

No related posts.

Category: Non-U.S.Surveillance

Post navigation

← Extension Gives You More Control Over Your Facebook Privacy
Lawsuit by Florida state trooper raises serious concerns about protection of state’s database of driver’s license info →

Search

Contact Me

Email: info[at]pogowasright.org
Security Issue: security[at]pogowasright.org
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]pogowasright.org

Research Report of Note

A report by EPIC.org:

State Attorneys General & Privacy: Enforcement Trends, 2020-2024

Categories

Recent Posts

  • OpenAI fights order to turn over millions of ChatGPT conversations
  • Maryland Privacy Crackdown Raises Bar for Disclosure Compliance
  • Lawmakers Warn Governors About Sharing Drivers’ Data with Federal Government
  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs

RSS Recent Posts at DataBreaches.net

  • Checkout.com Discloses Data Breach After Extortion Attempt
  • Washington Post hack exposes personal data of John Bolton, almost 10,000 others
  • Draft UK Cyber Security and Resilience Bill Enters UK Parliament
  • Suspected Russian hacker reportedly detained in Thailand, faces possible US extradition
  • Did you hear the one about the ransom victim who made a ransom installment payment after they were told that it wouldn’t be accepted?
©2025 PogoWasRight.org. All rights reserved.