PogoWasRight.org

Menu
  • About
  • Privacy
Menu

School had no right to read messages on student’s cell phone, family say

Posted on October 23, 2009July 3, 2025 by Dissent

Eric Been reports:

Owensboro High School violated the Constitution by confiscating a student’s cell phone after it slipped from his pocket during class, and expelling him because of the text messages that school officials read on it, the student’s family claims in Federal Court.

The student, identified only as G.C., says his teacher confiscated his phone “pursuant to school policy,” on Sept. 2. The teacher, the principal and two assistant principals then performed a “warrantless and illegal search” by reading the text messages on the phone, the family says.

The family says G.C. was expelled “as a result of the warrantless and illegal search.”

Read more on Courthouse News.

Related: Lawsuit: G.C. III v. Owensboro Public Schools (pdf)

According to the district’s policies:

Student Search & Seizure

Although students have the right to freedom from unreasonable search and seizure, school officials have the right, under the law, to search students or their property when there is a reasonable suspicion they have something that violates school rules or endangers others.

Searches may include the student, his/her locker, desk, automobile, cell phone or other personal belongings. The Police Detection Canine Team may conduct random and unannounced searches of general school areas, including school lockers and parking lots.

A school official having reasonable suspicion that the student is in possession of a weapon may use a hand-held metal detector.

[…]

Possession of Telecommunication Devices Prohibited

Under state law (KRS 158.165), a student in the Owensboro Public School District may not activate a telecommunications device on school property or while at a school-related activity or school sponsored activity during the regular school hours unless he/she is acting in the capacity of a volunteer fire fighter or emergency medical service worker.

“Telecommunication devices” refers to devices that emit an audible signal, vibrates, displays a message, or otherwise summons or delivers a communication to the processor, including, but not limited to, a paging device and a cellular telephone. This offense will be treated as “refusal to follow directives” under the Code of Acceptable Behavior and Discipline.

Reference KRS 158.165

Consequences for Violation of the Policy

1st Offense – The school administrator will confiscate the telecommunication device. A required parent conference must take place before the telecommunication device is returned.

2nd Offense – Same as 1st offense with the option of in-house suspension for 4 days. The student loses the privilege to carry a device for the remainder of the year.

3rd Offense — Same as 2nd offense with the option of in-house suspension for 7 days.

4th Offense or more – Forfeit telecommunication device and suspend to a hearing with the DPP.
Disciplinary options:

  • Long-term alternative placement
  • Beyond control charges filed

Related posts:

  • He Wanted Privacy. His College Gave Him None
  • Chicago Public Schools Monitored Social Media for Signs of Violence, Gang Membership
Category: BreachesCourtU.S.Youth & Schools

Post navigation

← Deutsche Bahn fined 1.12 million euros for data protection breach
Pirate Bay back in the courtroom →

Now more than ever

Search

Contact Me

Email: [email protected]

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Categories

Recent Posts

  • Google Settles Privacy Class Action Over Period Tracking App
  • ICE Is Searching a Massive Insurance and Medical Bill Database to Find Deportation Targets
  • Franklin, Tennessee Resident Sentenced to 30 Months in Federal Prison on Multiple Cyber Stalking Charges
  • On July 7, Gemini AI will access your WhatsApp and more. Learn how to disable it on Android.
  • German court awards Facebook user €5,000 for data protection violations
  • Record-Breaking $1.55M CCPA Settlement Against Health Information Website Publisher
  • Ninth Circuit Reviews Website Tracking Class Actions and the Reach of California’s Privacy Law

RSS Recent Posts on DataBreaches.net

  • Avantic Medical Lab hacked; patient data leaked by Everest Group
  • Integrated Oncology Network victim of phishing attack; multiple locations affected (2)
  • HHS’ Office for Civil Rights Settles HIPAA Privacy and Security Rule Investigation with Deer Oaks Behavioral Health for $225k and a Corrective Action Plan
  • HB1127 Explained: North Dakota’s New InfoSec Requirements for Financial Corporations
  • Credit reports among personal data of 190,000 breached, put for sale on Dark Web; IT vendor fined
©2025 PogoWasRight.org. All rights reserved.