PogoWasRight.org

Menu
  • About
  • Privacy
Menu

Senate Bill Would Expand Student Privacy Protections to Account for AI Adoption, (Oct 29, 2025)

Posted on October 30, 2025 by Dissent

Tom Leithauser reports:

K-12 schools would be required to improve their privacy practices to account for the adoption of artificial intelligence and other technologies under legislation introduced by Sen. Bill Cassidy (R., La.), chairman of the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee.

The Learning Innovation and Family Empowerment (LIFE) with AI Act (S.B. 3063, 119th Cong. (2025)) would amend the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 (FERPA) to update the law’s approach to student privacy.

“The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) protects student education records and parental rights, but in its 51-year existence, student data uses and education technology have transformed. As schools adopt new, artificial-intelligence-enabled educational technology, parents deserve transparent notice, consent methods, and assurance that student data is safeguarded,” according to a fact sheet.

The bill would direct the Department of Education (DoE) to create a program that would recognize schools and districts that enact robust privacy programs by awarding them a “Golden Seal of Excellence in Student Data Privacy,” the fact sheet says.

It would withhold DoE funds from schools and school districts that allow “the use of student photographs for training facial recognition systems, including those using artificial intelligence, without prior parental consent,” according to the bill’s text.

Read more on VitalLaw to read about other provisions of the bill.

FERPA has been long overdue for an overhaul to mandate greater privacy protections and requirements. Is this the bill that we want?

Related posts:

  • Amassing Student Data and Dissipating Privacy Rights
  • EPIC Obtains FERPA Complaints from Education Department
Category: LawsU.S.Youth & Schools

Post navigation

← DOJ’s Gender Care Subpoena Blocked as ‘Prosecutorial Coercion’
Landmark civil penalty of AU$5.8 million issued under Australia’s Privacy Act →

Search

Contact Me

Email: info[at]pogowasright.org
Security Issue: security[at]pogowasright.org
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]pogowasright.org

Research Report of Note

A report by EPIC.org:

State Attorneys General & Privacy: Enforcement Trends, 2020-2024

Categories

Recent Posts

  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation
  • Who’s watching the watchers? This Mozilla fellow, and her Surveillance Watch map
  • EPIC Publishes New Whitepaper Detailing Privacy Risks of Government Data Mining Programs

RSS Recent Posts at DataBreaches.net

  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
©2025 PogoWasRight.org. All rights reserved.