PogoWasRight.org

Menu
  • About
  • Privacy
Menu

Target Refused To Process Fraud Claim Unless Customer Gave Up Sensitive Info

Posted on January 17, 2014July 1, 2025 by Dissent

Christina Hager reports that a consumer in Massachusetts  was appalled when Target requested all their personal information to investigate a fraud claim.

“I was kind of horrified. I kind of thought it was a scam when I looked at the form, because of the kind of information they were asking. I told them they were insane to be asking for it,” he said. When he refused, the customer service representative told him they could not process his claim without it. “I wasn’t getting anywhere, so I asked for a manager. That took four or five minutes. The supervisor came on the line and she was even more aggressive with it.”

When we contacted Target, the company changed its tune. “Our policy is to investigate all fraud claims even if the form is not filled out,” said spokesperson Molly Snyder. “And filling out the form is not a requirement. However, if we don’t have the form filled out it makes our investigation more difficult.”

The State Attorney General’s office says the form is legitimate, but if customers aren’t getting their claims processed because they’re uncomfortable giving up personal information, they should call the state’s consumer hotline: 617-727-8400.

Read more on CBS.

Thanks to Joe Cadillic for this link.

No related posts.

Category: Breaches

Post navigation

← Google Accused in Revised Lawsuit of Violating Privacy Policy
AI is so over: This is artificial empathy →

Search

Contact Me

Email: info[at]pogowasright.org
Security Issue: security[at]pogowasright.org
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]pogowasright.org

Research Report of Note

A report by EPIC.org:

State Attorneys General & Privacy: Enforcement Trends, 2020-2024

Categories

Recent Posts

  • Lawmakers Warn Governors About Sharing Drivers’ Data with Federal Government
  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation
  • Who’s watching the watchers? This Mozilla fellow, and her Surveillance Watch map

RSS Recent Posts at DataBreaches.net

  • Suspected Russian hacker reportedly detained in Thailand, faces possible US extradition
  • Did you hear the one about the ransom victim who made a ransom installment payment after they were told that it wouldn’t be accepted?
  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
©2025 PogoWasRight.org. All rights reserved.