PogoWasRight.org

Menu
  • About
  • Privacy
Menu

The current buzz on Buzz and a comment

Posted on February 13, 2010July 3, 2025 by Dissent

Following its launch, Google Buzz was excoriated by a number of privacy advocates and groups for its default settings that exposed a user’s most frequent email and chat contacts. Not surprisingly, Google then scrambled to address the default privacy settings issue. But as Philipp Lenssen writes on Google Blogoscoped, concerns remain.

What is particularly offensive to this privacy advocate is the fact that Google — after everything it has dealt with on privacy over the years — knowingly set the defaults in a way that would publicly expose what most people would consider private information. While Marc Rotenberg of EPIC describes this as a “blunder” on Google’s part, and Google defends its decision while making changes, Google’s default settings and the fact that it did not post a prominent warning on its site alerting users that if they use Buzz, their most frequent email contacts would be publicly on display immediately if their contacts also use Buzz, well, those actions make this privacy advocate question how much Google really is committed to user privacy. Given all the public outcry from a significant minority of users when Facebook set default settings to public, why did Google do this without prominent warnings?

Offering Buzz as a standalone, which Google is reportedly considering, might be a more attractive option for those concerned about their privacy than the integrated version. Google indicates it will retain the integrated version if it does offer Buzz without Gmail integration.

No related posts.

Category: Online

Post navigation

← Anonymity is no guarantee in online postings
E.W. Scripps Co. joins text privacy case before Supreme Court →

Now more than ever

Search

Contact Me

Email: info@pogowasright.org

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Categories

Recent Posts

  • Navigating Privacy Gaps and New Legal Requirements for Companies Processing Genetic Data
  • Germany’s top court holds that police can only use spyware to investigate serious crimes
  • Flightradar24 receives reprimand for violating aircraft data privacy rights
  • Nebraska Attorney General Sues GM and OnStar Over Alleged Privacy Violations
  • Federal Court Allows Privacy Related Claims to Proceed in a Proposed Class Action Lawsuit Against Motorola
  • Italian Garante Adopts Statement on Health Data and AI
  • Trump administration is launching a new private health tracking system with Big Tech’s help

RSS Recent Posts on DataBreaches.net

  • Russia Is Suspected to Be Behind Breach of Federal Court Filing System
  • NL: Hacked lab paid ransom: ‘Millions of euros demanded’
  • Updating: Two Telegram channels and two accounts banned, one bounty offered, and BreachForums goes down
  • North Korean Kimsuky Hackers Suffer Data Breach as Insiders Leak Information Online
  • Hackers post stolen St. Paul data online as efforts to reset city employee passwords surge forward
©2025 PogoWasRight.org. All rights reserved.
Menu
  • About
  • Privacy