PogoWasRight.org

Menu
  • About
  • Privacy
Menu

The Fingerprint File Doesn’t Have to Bring You Down: NAI Offers Advertisers Guidance on Digital Fingerprinting & Location Tracking

Posted on August 4, 2015June 26, 2025 by Dissent

Christin McMeley and Bryan Thompson write:

Advertisers who use tools such as location data and newer non-cookie technologies to deliver interest-based advertising must carefully balance the use of those tools with consumer privacy.  To achieve this balance, the Network Advertising Initiative (NAI) – a digital advertising self-regulatory body – has recently released guidance for advertisers on how they can do both and stay in compliance with the NAI’s Code of Conduct.

The NAI released its Guidance for NAI Members: Use of Non-Cookie Technologies for Interest-Based Advertising Consistent with the NAI Code of Conduct (Beyond Cookie Guidance) on May 18, instructing its digital advertising members who conduct Interest-Based Advertising (IBA) and Ad Delivery and Reporting (ADR) how to employ non-cookie technology in line with the NAI’s Code.  Then on July 20, the NAI issued its Guidance for NAI Members: Determining Whether Location is Imprecise (Location Guidance), clarifying under what situations members’ use of location data for IBA may be considered “imprecise” and thus not require users’ opt-in consent. Both releases come on the heels of the NAI’s 2015 update to its Code of Conduct that clarified members’ privacy obligations.

Read more on DavisWrightTremaine Privacy & Security Law Blog.

 

No related posts.

Category: Business

Post navigation

← We made a new Do Not Track thing – not like you’ll use it or anything
Does the Government Have Carte Blanche to Retain Seized Data Indefinitely? In Amicus Brief to the Second Circuit, Policy Groups Argue No →

Search

Contact Me

Email: info[at]pogowasright.org
Security Issue: security[at]pogowasright.org
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]pogowasright.org

Research Report of Note

A report by EPIC.org:

State Attorneys General & Privacy: Enforcement Trends, 2020-2024

Categories

Recent Posts

  • Modern cars are spying on you. Here’s what you can do about it.
  • Attorney General James and Multistate Coalition Secure $5.1 Million from Education Software Company for Failing to Protect Students’ Data       
  • EU Parliament committee votes to advance controversial Europol data sharing proposal
  • DHS offers “disturbing new excuses” to seize kids’ biometric data, expert says
  • California Adds Injunctive Relief to its Right of Publicity Statute and Extends Liability to Digital Replicas
  • DHS Gives Local Cops a Facial Recognition App To Find Immigrants
  • Phone location data of top EU officials for sale, report finds

RSS Recent Posts at DataBreaches.net

  • NCCIA arrests man over massive data breach involving millions of Pakistanis
  • Defense Contractors Are Silencing Their Cybersecurity Watchdogs
  • Fourth Circuit Weighs in on Standing in Data Breach Class Actions
  • ALT5 Sigma sues former consultant over alleged data breach
  • Is your cyberinsurance paid up? Are you sure?
©2025 PogoWasRight.org. All rights reserved.