PogoWasRight.org

Menu
  • About
  • Privacy
Menu

This creepy facial recognition app lets users find strangers on Facebook by taking their picture

Posted on March 14, 2017 by pogowasright.org

Update: This (Facezam) all turned out to be a hoax by a marketing firm. The fact that some of us found it believable is a topic for another discussion at another time.

Original post:

Cara McGoogan reports:

A facial recognition app that can identify strangers from a photograph has been created by a British entrepreneur.

Facezam can identify people by matching a photo of them with their Facebook profile. All users have to do is take a picture of someone on the street and run it through the app, which will tell them who it thinks the person in the photo is.

“Facezam could be the end of our anonymous societies,” said Jack Kenyon, founder of Facezam. “Users will be able to identify anyone within a matter of seconds, which means privacy will no longer exist in public society.”

Read more on The Telegraph.

h/t, Joe Cadillic

Category: OnlineSurveillance

Post navigation

← Italian DPA Issues Record Data Privacy Fine Against Sigue Global Service Ltd
Developers sue Ireland’s Data Protection Commissioner over Nama data →

4 thoughts on “This creepy facial recognition app lets users find strangers on Facebook by taking their picture”

  1. Anonymous says:
    March 15, 2017 at 10:03 am

    FYI – The link is to a page that says Facezam is a hoax.

    1. Dissent says:
      March 15, 2017 at 10:34 am

      Yeah, I just found out this morning and came back to see if I needed to post an update. Thanks.

  2. Anonymous says:
    March 16, 2017 at 6:52 am

    This morning (16 March) I checked the Telegraph page you link to and notice that the story is different from the quote you give above. It now reports Facezam as a hoax: ‘A fake facial recognition app that claimed to be able to identify strangers from a photograph has turned out to be a publicity stunt….’. I don’t know whether (1) link is to a later story, (2) the Telegraph corrected the story (but there’s no acknowledgment of this on the page); or the quote above is wrong.

    1. Dissent says:
      March 16, 2017 at 9:02 am

      They did a silent edit. My quote was from their original story, which is why I left it and just added the update that it was all a hoax.

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

Search

Contact Me

Email: [email protected]

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Categories

Recent Posts

  • The Markup caught 4 more states sharing personal health data with Big Tech
  • Privacy in the Big Sky State: Montana’s Consumer Privacy Law Gets Amended
  • UK Passes Data Use and Access Regulation Bill
  • Officials defend Liberal bill that would force hospitals, banks, hotels to hand over data
  • US Judge Invalidates Biden Rule Protecting Privacy for Abortions
  • DOJ’s Data Security Program: Key Compliance Considerations for Impacted Entities
  • 23andMe fined £2.31 million for failing to protect UK users’ genetic data

RSS Recent Posts on DataBreaches.net

  • CoinMarketCap Hacked, Scrambles to Remove Malicious Wallet Verification Popup
  • Montana Attorney General launches investigation into Lee Enterprises data breach
  • AT&T gets preliminary approval for $177 million data breach settlement
  • Aflac notifies SEC of breach suspected to be work of Scattered Spider
  • Former JBLM soldier pleads guilty to attempting to share military secrets with China
©2025 PogoWasRight.org. All rights reserved.