PogoWasRight.org

Menu
  • About
  • Privacy
Menu

UK: ICO says that voice data collected unlawfully by HMRC should be deleted

Posted on May 3, 2019June 25, 2025 by Dissent

Statement from the Information Commissioner’s Office following investigation of a complaint involving Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC):

An ICO investigation into HMRC’s Voice ID service was prompted by a complaint from Big Brother Watch about the department’s conduct. The investigation focused on the use of voice authentication for customer verification on some of HMRC’s helplines since January 2017.

The ICO found that HMRC failed to give customers sufficient information about how their biometric data would be processed and failed to give them the chance to give or withhold consent. This is a breach of the General Data Protection Regulation.

The ICO issued a preliminary enforcement notice to HMRC on April 4, 2019 stating the Information Commissioner’s initial decision to compel the department to delete all biometric data held under the Voice ID system for which it does not have explicit consent.

The ICO will issue its final enforcement notice next week giving HMRC 28 days from that date to complete deletion of relevant records.

Steve Wood, Deputy Commissioner at the ICO, said:

“We welcome HMRC’s prompt action to begin deleting personal data that it obtained unlawfully. Our investigation exposed a significant breach of data protection law – HMRC appears to have given little or no consideration to it with regard to its Voice ID service.

“Innovative digital services help make our lives easier but it must not be at the expense of people’s fundamental right to privacy. Organisations must be transparent and fair and, when necessary, obtain consent from people about how their information will be used. When that doesn’t happen, the ICO will take action to protect the public.”

The ICO’s investigation was carried out under the GDPR, new rules that came into force last year. Under the GDPR, biometric data is considered special category information and is subject to stricter conditions.

No related posts.

Category: BreachesGovtNon-U.S.

Post navigation

← Canadian Banks and Telecoms Are Collaborating on a Digital ID System
Alexa, don’t store this recording: California bill targets smart home speakers →

Search

Contact Me

Email: info[at]pogowasright.org
Security Issue: security[at]pogowasright.org
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: Dissent.73
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]pogowasright.org

Research Report of Note

A report by EPIC.org:

State Attorneys General & Privacy: Enforcement Trends, 2020-2024

Categories

Recent Posts

  • PRIVACY—S.D. Cal.: Employee did not waive privacy right in personal email data on company provided laptop, (Dec 5, 2025)
  • EU justice chief draws red line on privacy reforms
  • Kaiser Permanente to Pay Up to $47.5M in Web Tracker Lawsuit
  • How Palantir shifted course to play key role in ICE deportations
  • U.S. Judge Blocks Trump From Cutting Medicaid Funding For Planned Parenthood In 22 States
  • India backs off mandatory ‘cyber safety’ app after surveillance backlash
  • Judge orders Trump administration to halt warrantless immigration arrests in District of Columbia

RSS Recent Posts at DataBreaches.net

  • Ex-teen hackers warn parents are clueless as children steal ‘millions’
  • UK Government Considers Computer Misuse Act Revision
  • Japan issues arrest warrant against teen suspected of cyberattack using AI
  • How old is the average hacker? What does a new research report suggest? (1)
  • Marquis data breach impacts over 74 US banks, credit unions
©2025 PogoWasRight.org. All rights reserved.