PogoWasRight.org

Menu
  • About
  • Privacy
Menu

UK: Open consultation: Interception of communications and equipment interference: draft codes of practice

Posted on February 20, 2015June 30, 2025 by Dissent

Ah, I had missed this, but a kindly U.K. reader alerted me to my grave omission. From gov.uk:

Home Office
First published:6 February 2015
Part of: Protecting the UK against terrorism

This is a consultation on 2 draft codes of practice pursuant to section 71 of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (RIPA).

The first is an updated interception of communications code of practice. This includes new details about the operation of the regime for the interception under RIPA of communications sent or received from outside the UK. It also includes further information about the safeguards for the interception of legally privileged communications and minor changes to reflect developments in the law since the code was first introduced in 2002.

The second is a new equipment interference code of practice. This explains the circumstances and procedures that must be followed before the Security and Intelligence Agencies can interfere with electronic equipment, such as computers, and the rules that must apply to the processing, retention, destruction and disclosure of any information obtained by means of the interference.

The purpose of the codes is to make publicly available more information about the robust safeguards that apply to the police and the security and intelligence agencies in their use of investigatory powers.

The consultation seeks representations on the content of the draft codes of practice.

How to respond

This consultation runs for 6 weeks from 6 February until 20 March 2015.

Enquiries and responses should be sent to:

[email protected]

Please indicate in your response whether you are content for it to be published, with or without attributing it to you/your organisation.

Available documents:

  • Consultation document: equipment interference and interception of communications codes of practice PDF, 142KB, 5 pages
  • Equipment interference: draft code of practice PDF, 219KB, 30 pages
  • Interception of communications: draft code of practice PDF, 337KB, 34 pages

No related posts.

Category: Non-U.S.Surveillance

Post navigation

← Students object to online courses recording facial features, knuckles, voice
It was only a matter of time, right? →

Search

Contact Me

Email: info[at]pogowasright.org
Security Issue: security[at]pogowasright.org
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]pogowasright.org

Research Report of Note

A report by EPIC.org:

State Attorneys General & Privacy: Enforcement Trends, 2020-2024

Categories

Recent Posts

  • DHS offers “disturbing new excuses” to seize kids’ biometric data, expert says
  • California Adds Injunctive Relief to its Right of Publicity Statute and Extends Liability to Digital Replicas
  • DHS Gives Local Cops a Facial Recognition App To Find Immigrants
  • Phone location data of top EU officials for sale, report finds
  • DHS proposes biometrics expansion for immigrants, dropping age restrictions and requiring biometrics from some US citizens
  • Sling TV settles with California for allegedly violating state consumer privacy law
  • Massive Great Firewall Leak Exposes 500GB of Censorship Data

RSS Recent Posts at DataBreaches.net

  • Pro-Russian hackers target Belgian telecom websites in DDoS attack
  • Nevada Refused to Pay Cyberattack Ransom as Systems Sat Compromised for Months
  • Journalists going solo on Substack at risk from hackers
  • Kr: Investigation shows KT concealed malware infections, security failures leading to hacking breach
  • Hackers defraud multiple lawmakers, a Pakistan Senate committee told
©2025 PogoWasRight.org. All rights reserved.