PogoWasRight.org

Menu
  • About
  • Privacy
Menu

White Paper: The Impact of Privacy and Data Protection Legislation on Biometric Authentication

Posted on February 5, 2015June 30, 2025 by Dissent

This white paper from Goode Intelligence (GI) explores the impact of privacy and security on biometric systems and data. It identifies state privacy and data protection legislation that is applicable to biometrics and examines a legal memorandum commissioned by behavioral biometrics specialists BehavioSec.

The white paper argues that as more and more biometric solutions are deployed to mainstream digital services, questions surrounding the privacy and security implications of biometrics are increasingly being asked. With the growth of biometric technology and its expansion on to consumer digital services, privacy and security concerns are correspondingly growing.

The white paper explores:

  • The impact of privacy and security on biometrics
  • Definition of Biometric Data
  • The impact of data protection legislation on biometric data
    • The European Union experience
    • Other regions experience
  • Legal analysis on BehavioSec’s Behavioral Biometrics Technology
  • An introduction to BehavioSec’s Behavioral Biometrics

Free download of the white paper here (Goode Intelligence)

via Gina Gordon, SecureID News

No related posts.

Category: Misc

Post navigation

← Ca: Kelowna RCMP ‘routinely’ breach privacy during strip searches: Judge
Congress to Hold Hearing on Student Privacy →

1 thought on “White Paper: The Impact of Privacy and Data Protection Legislation on Biometric Authentication”

  1. Anonymous says:
    February 6, 2015 at 8:19 am

    I think it’s ironic that one has to sign up and provide personally identifying information in order to read a “free” white paper on the impact authentication (biometric) has on personal privacy.

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

Search

Contact Me

Email: info@pogowasright.org

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Categories

Recent Posts

  • Navigating Privacy Gaps and New Legal Requirements for Companies Processing Genetic Data
  • Germany’s top court holds that police can only use spyware to investigate serious crimes
  • Flightradar24 receives reprimand for violating aircraft data privacy rights
  • Nebraska Attorney General Sues GM and OnStar Over Alleged Privacy Violations
  • Federal Court Allows Privacy Related Claims to Proceed in a Proposed Class Action Lawsuit Against Motorola
  • Italian Garante Adopts Statement on Health Data and AI
  • Trump administration is launching a new private health tracking system with Big Tech’s help

RSS Recent Posts on DataBreaches.net

  • Updating: Two Telegram channels and two accounts banned, one bounty offered, and BreachForums goes down
  • North Korean Kimsuky Hackers Suffer Data Breach as Insiders Leak Information Online
  • Hackers post stolen St. Paul data online as efforts to reset city employee passwords surge forward
  • Justice Department Announces Coordinated Disruption Actions Against BlackSuit (Royal) Ransomware Operations
  • NL: Hackers breach cancer screening data of almost 500,000 women
©2025 PogoWasRight.org. All rights reserved.
Menu
  • About
  • Privacy