PogoWasRight.org

Menu
  • About
  • Privacy
Menu

Affixing ankle bracelet to monitor suspect is a “search,” Supreme Court holds

Posted on March 30, 2015 by pogowasright.org

Orin Kerr writes:

The case is Grady v. North Carolina. Held: Forcing someone to wear an ankle bracelet to monitor location is a Fourth Amendment search. The new decision extends the Jones search doctrine to searches of persons, and it provides more opportunity to ponder what the Jones test means. I’ll start with the history, then discuss the new decision, and then offer some thoughts on the new case.

Read more on The Volokh Conspiracy.

Category: CourtSurveillanceU.S.

Post navigation

← No drone surveillance of crime scene (even from 150 feet above), police say
Ca: Key features of District of Saanich employee monitoring software violate employee privacy rights →

Now more than ever

Search

Contact Me

Email: info@pogowasright.org

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Categories

Recent Posts

  • The App Store Freedom Act Compromises User Privacy To Punish Big Tech
  • Florida bill requiring encryption backdoors for social media accounts has failed
  • Apple Siri Eavesdropping Payout Deadline Confirmed—How To Make A Claim
  • Privacy matters to Canadians – Privacy Commissioner of Canada marks Privacy Awareness Week with release of latest survey results
  • Missouri Clinic Must Give State AG Minor Trans Care Information
  • Georgia hospital defeats data-tracking lawsuit
  • No Postal Service Data Sharing to Deport Immigrants

RSS Recent Posts on DataBreaches.net

  • Masimo Manufacturing Facilities Hit by Cyberattack
  • Education giant Pearson hit by cyberattack exposing customer data
  • Star Health hacker claims sending bullets, threats to top executives: Reports
  • Nova Scotia Power hit by cyberattack, critical infrastructure targeted, no outages reported
  • Georgia hospital defeats data-tracking lawsuit
©2025 PogoWasRight.org. All rights reserved.
Menu
  • About
  • Privacy