PogoWasRight.org

Menu
  • About
  • Privacy
Menu

AU: Australian Privacy Principle guidelines updated

Posted on April 6, 2015June 30, 2025 by Dissent

The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC) has issued updates to the Australian Privacy Principle (APP) guidelines. The APP guidelines were released in February 2014 ahead of the commencement of privacy law reform, and are the primary guidance for entities in how to interpret and comply with the APPs. These updates have been made following feedback from stakeholders throughout the first year of the new privacy laws.

Changes have been made to four chapters, clarifying some aspects of the guidance and responding to issues such as the introduction of separate privacy legislation in the ACT. Some of the main changes are:

  • Chapter A: to explain that the APP guidelines may provide relevant guidance to Australian Capital Territory public sector agencies covered by the ACT Information Privacy Act 2014
  • Chapter B: to clarify and expand upon guidance about ‘carries on business in Australia’, a component of the test for whether an APP entity has an ‘Australian link’
  • Chapter 8: to clarify guidance about the circumstances where an APP entity may be taken to breach the APPs, when it provides personal information to an overseas contractor as a ‘use’, and the information is mishandled overseas; and to expand guidance about the circumstances in which the ‘international agreement’ exception in APP 8.2(e) applies
  • Chapter 11: to update guidance about ‘reasonable steps’ and examples for consistency with the OAIC’s Guide to securing personal information (2015).

The APP guidelines outline the mandatory requirements in the APPs, the Australian Information Commissioner’s interpretation of the APPs and examples of how the APPs may apply to particular circumstances, as well as good privacy practice.

A summary of the changes and a link to previous versions of these Chapters of the guidelines is available on the APP guidelines pageof our website.

SOURCE: Office of the Australian Information Commissioner’s Office

No related posts.

Category: Featured NewsNon-U.S.

Post navigation

← Long Island customers fight to opt out of utility smart meters amid privacy, health concerns
Military: The “precarious balance” of medical privacy and command curiosity →

Search

Contact Me

Email: info[at]pogowasright.org
Security Issue: security[at]pogowasright.org
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]pogowasright.org

Research Report of Note

A report by EPIC.org:

State Attorneys General & Privacy: Enforcement Trends, 2020-2024

Categories

Recent Posts

  • Lawmakers Warn Governors About Sharing Drivers’ Data with Federal Government
  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation
  • Who’s watching the watchers? This Mozilla fellow, and her Surveillance Watch map

RSS Recent Posts at DataBreaches.net

  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
©2025 PogoWasRight.org. All rights reserved.