Orin Kerr writes: “Yes,” says Judge Maurice Paul in United States v. Durdley, 2010 WL 916107 (N.D. Fla. 2010), handed down on March 11. I haven’t seen any cases quite like this, but I tend to think the decision is wrong. In this post, I wanted to explain the decision and then say why I…
Category: U.S.
New Missouri bill designed to crack down on drunken drivers
Police in Missouri will have the authority to extract blood samples from suspected drunken drivers without a warrant, if a new bill in Missouri becomes law. […] Missouri representative Rachel Bringer supports tightening restrictions on past offenders. Bringer said “If someone fails to take a breathalyzer test their drivers license is revoked for one year…
Fulfilling Government 2.0’s Promise with Robust Privacy Protections
Danielle Keats Citron has an article in the March issue of the George Washington Law Review, “Fulfilling Government 2.0’s Promise with Robust Privacy Protections.” The abstract: The public can now friend the White House and scores of agencies on social networks, virtual worlds, and video-sharing sites. The Obama Administration sees this trend as crucial to…
Bringing US Surveillance Laws Into the 21st Century
Scott M. Fulton, III writes: You may think that your communications with other individuals over the Internet may be protected from unreasonable use by U.S. law enforcement without subpoena and due process. The truth is, judges have been loosening the interpretation of a 1986 wiretapping law, almost pretending that it did apply to present circumstances….