PogoWasRight.org

Menu
  • About
  • Privacy
Menu

EU Law, Freedom of Information and Data Protection – Part 2 – Aidan O’Neill QC

Posted on December 16, 2010July 3, 2025 by Dissent

This is the second part of a three part post. In this part Aidan O’Neill considers EU secondary legislation on access to documents.

[…]

Data protection and EU Institutions

Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 was made by the EU legislature under reference Article 286 EC (what is now Article 16(2) TFEU, the provisions of which are outlined above).   Those protected under the regulations are those identified or identifiable individuals whose personal data are processed by EU institutions or bodies in any context whatsoever.   The regulation’s provisions do not apply to wholly anonymised data.  But it is not limited, for example, simply to those who are employed by the EU.

“Personal data” for the purposes of the Regulation is any information held on an individual; the Regulation does not apply to information held on a company or other legal person. (See Case T‑198/03 Bank Austria Creditanstalt v Commission [2006] ECR II‑1429 at paragraph 95) Particularly sensitive personal data is that which may disclose details of an individual’s racial or ethnic origin, political opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs or trade-union membership, health or sex life; the lawful processing of such information has to be either expressly consented to or otherwise shown to be specifically necessary for a legitimate purpose (Article 10(2), which may include for the purposes of preventive medicine, medical diagnosis, the provision of care or treatment or the management of health-care services and be subject to the rules on medical confidentiality (Article 10(3).

Read more on Inforrm.

No related posts.

Category: LawsNon-U.S.

Post navigation

← Commerce Online Privacy Report Gets Mixed Grades
Obama nominates two to privacy board →

Search

Contact Me

Email: info[at]pogowasright.org
Security Issue: security[at]pogowasright.org
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: Dissent.73
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]pogowasright.org

Research Report of Note

A report by EPIC.org:

State Attorneys General & Privacy: Enforcement Trends, 2020-2024

Categories

Recent Posts

  • Tool allows stealthy tracking of Signal and WhatsApp users through delivery receipts
  • Oh Great, Smart Glasses That Record Everything You Say
  • CBP Agents Held This U.S. Citizen for Hours Until He Agreed To Let Them Search His Electronic Devices
  • U.S. Plans to Scrutinize Foreign Tourists’ Social Media History
  • ANNOUNCEMENT: EFF Launches Age Verification Hub as Resource Against Misguided Laws
  • FTC Denies Petition from SpyFone App CEO to Vacate 2021 Order
  • Privacy concerns raised as Grok AI found to be a stalker’s best friend

RSS Recent Posts at DataBreaches.net

  • Virginia Urology Silent on Possible Data Breach as Purported Patient Data Begins to Leak
  • Village of Golf Manor considering paying ransom amid cyberattack (1)
  • Teen who allegedly stole millions of personal data records arrested in Spain
  • Akira ransomware: FBI tallies 250 million in payouts
  • IE: HSE confirms second ransomware attack but ‘no evidence’ patient data was stolen
©2025 PogoWasRight.org. All rights reserved.