PogoWasRight.org

Menu
  • About
  • Privacy
Menu

European Commission requests Germany to ensure independence of data supervisory authority

Posted on April 6, 2011July 3, 2025 by Dissent

The European Commission has acted today to ensure that the EU rules on the protection of personal data are respected in Germany. The Commission has formally requested Germany to comply with a judgment on 9 March 2010 by the EU’s Court of Justice (C-518/07). The Court had ruled that Germany had failed to correctly transpose the requirement that data protection supervisory authorities had to act in “complete independence”. In its letter of formal notice, the Commission has now asked Germany to comply with the Court judgement and complete the implementation of the Directive. The Commission may ask the Court to impose a lump sum or penalty payment if Germany fails to comply within two months.

Under the 1995 EU Data Protection Directive (Directive 95/46/EC), Member States are obliged to set up one or more public authorities in charge of monitoring the application of the Directive. These authorities must act with complete independence.

The organisation of the supervision of personal data processing by non-public bodies in the 16 German Länder varies. It is assigned either to the data protection commissioner of the respective Land or general Land government organisations. They have one thing in common: they are expressly subject to State scrutiny.

The Court held that such State scrutiny is not consistent with the requirements of independence within the meaning of the EU Data Protection Directive. The Court confirmed that the authorities responsible for supervising the processing of personal data must enjoy an independence allowing them to perform their duties free from external influence. That independence precludes not only any influence exercised by the supervised bodies, but also any other external influence, whether direct or indirect, which could call into question the authority’s task of establishing a fair balance between the right to private life and the free movement of personal data.

No legal measures implementing the judgment have been adopted in 15 out of 16 federal Länder. Thus the judgment of the Court has not yet been fully implemented.

Background

The 1995 Data Protection Directive (95/46/EC) regulates the processing of personal data within the EU. It aims to protect people’s fundamental rights and freedoms – in particular the right to data protection – as well as ensuring the free flow of data within the Single Market. The Directive sets out conditions for processing data, including the need to inform individuals and gain their consent, have legitimate reasons for processing data and only use data for the purposes for which it was collected. It also requires Member States to set up an independent supervisory body to monitor data protection levels in the country.

The Data Protection Directive applies to all personal data processing activities in Member States in both the public and the private sectors. However, it does not apply to the processing of personal data to the areas of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters.

For more information

MEMO/11/220

Justice and Home Affairs Newsroom: http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/news/intro/news_intro_en.htm

Homepage of Viviane Reding, Vice President and Commissioner for Justice, Fundamental Rights and Citizenship: http://ec.europa.eu/commission_2010-2014/reding/index_en.htm

Source: European Commission

No related posts.

Category: Non-U.S.

Post navigation

← ACLU Responds To Maryland Division Of Corrections’ Revision Of Invasive Social Media Policy
Justice Department opposes digital privacy reforms →

Search

Contact Me

Email: info[at]pogowasright.org
Security Issue: security[at]pogowasright.org
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: Dissent.73
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]pogowasright.org

Research Report of Note

A report by EPIC.org:

State Attorneys General & Privacy: Enforcement Trends, 2020-2024

Categories

Recent Posts

  • PRIVACY—S.D. Cal.: Employee did not waive privacy right in personal email data on company provided laptop, (Dec 5, 2025)
  • EU justice chief draws red line on privacy reforms
  • Kaiser Permanente to Pay Up to $47.5M in Web Tracker Lawsuit
  • How Palantir shifted course to play key role in ICE deportations
  • U.S. Judge Blocks Trump From Cutting Medicaid Funding For Planned Parenthood In 22 States
  • India backs off mandatory ‘cyber safety’ app after surveillance backlash
  • Judge orders Trump administration to halt warrantless immigration arrests in District of Columbia

RSS Recent Posts at DataBreaches.net

  • UK Government Considers Computer Misuse Act Revision
  • Japan issues arrest warrant against teen suspected of cyberattack using AI
  • How old is the average hacker? What does a new research report suggest? (1)
  • Marquis data breach impacts over 74 US banks, credit unions
  • Virginia Twins Arrested for Conspiring to Destroy Government Databases
©2025 PogoWasRight.org. All rights reserved.