PogoWasRight.org

Menu
  • About
  • Privacy
Menu

FTC Approves Final Order In TRUSTe Privacy Case

Posted on March 18, 2015June 30, 2025 by Dissent

After a public comment period, the Federal Trade Commission has approved a final order resolving the Commission’s complaint against TRUSTe, Inc. for deceiving consumers about its privacy seal program.

The settlement was first announced in November 2014. In its complaint, the FTC alleged that TRUSTe failed to conduct promised annual recertifications of companies participating in its privacy seal program more than 1,000 times between 2006 and 2013. The complaint also alleged that TRUSTe misrepresented its status as a non-profit entity.

Under the terms of the order, TRUSTe is prohibited from making misrepresentations about its certification process, its corporate status, or whether an entity participates in its programs. In addition, TRUSTe must not provide other companies or entities with the means to make misrepresentations about these facts, such as through incorrect or inaccurate model language.

The order also requires the company in its role as a COPPA safe harbor to provide detailed information about its COPPA-related activities in its annual filing to the FTC, as well as maintaining comprehensive records about its COPPA safe harbor activities for ten years. Each of these provisions represents an increase in the reporting requirements laid out under the COPPA Rule for safe harbor programs. The company must also pay $200,000 as part of the settlement.

The Commission vote to approve the final order and letters to commenters was 5-0.

SOURCE: Federal Trade Commission

Related posts:

  • Oath Agrees to $5 Million Settlement Over Children’s Privacy Online
  • TRUSTe Settles FTC Charges it Deceived Consumers Through Its Privacy Seal Program
  • FTC Settles with Twelve Companies Falsely Claiming to Comply with International Safe Harbor Privacy Framework
  • Fortnite Video Game Maker Epic Games to Pay More Than Half a Billion Dollars over FTC Allegations of Privacy Violations and Unwanted Charges
Category: BusinessGovt

Post navigation

← Brennan Center: What Went Wrong with the FISA Court
French Surveillance Bill Would Legalize Data Monitoring →

Search

Contact Me

Email: info[at]pogowasright.org
Security Issue: security[at]pogowasright.org
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]pogowasright.org

Research Report of Note

A report by EPIC.org:

State Attorneys General & Privacy: Enforcement Trends, 2020-2024

Categories

Recent Posts

  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation
  • Who’s watching the watchers? This Mozilla fellow, and her Surveillance Watch map
  • EPIC Publishes New Whitepaper Detailing Privacy Risks of Government Data Mining Programs
  • Modern cars are spying on you. Here’s what you can do about it.

RSS Recent Posts at DataBreaches.net

  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
©2025 PogoWasRight.org. All rights reserved.