PogoWasRight.org

Menu
  • About
  • Privacy
Menu

Furious Arguments in Facebook Privacy Case

Posted on October 2, 2014July 1, 2025 by Dissent

Maria Dinzeo reports:

In a case with major implications for privacy in Internet communications, a federal judge heard arguments from Facebook and a class who claim the social network illegally scans private messages for content it can use for targeted advertising.

No case has ever claimed Facebook users have property rights as far as their Facebook messages are concerned. Until now.

Read more on Courthouse News.

No related posts.

Category: BusinessCourtFeatured NewsOnline

Post navigation

← Hacked celebs’ lawyers threaten to sue Google
Third Circuit gives narrow reading to exclusionary rule →

Now more than ever

Search

Contact Me

Email: info@pogowasright.org

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Categories

Recent Posts

  • Congress tries to outlaw AI that jacks up prices based on what it knows about you
  • Microsoft’s controversial Recall feature is now blocked by Brave and AdGuard
  • Trump Administration Issues AI Action Plan and Series of AI Executive Orders
  • Indonesia asked to reassess data privacy terms in new U.S. trade deal
  • Meta Denies Tracking Menstrual Data in Flo Health Privacy Trial
  • Wikipedia seeks to shield contributors from UK law targeting online anonymity
  • British government reportedlu set to back down on secret iCloud backdoor after US pressure

RSS Recent Posts on DataBreaches.net

  • Scattered Spider Hijacks VMware ESXi to Deploy Ransomware on Critical U.S. Infrastructure
  • Hacker group “Silent Crow” claims responsibility for cyberattack on Russia’s Aeroflot
  • AIIMS ORBO Portal Vulnerability Exposing Sensitive Organ Donor Data Discovered by Researcher
  • Two Data Breaches in Three Years: McKenzie Health
  • Scattered Spider is running a VMware ESXi hacking spree
©2025 PogoWasRight.org. All rights reserved.
Menu
  • About
  • Privacy