PogoWasRight.org

Menu
  • About
  • Privacy
Menu

Furious Arguments in Facebook Privacy Case

Posted on October 2, 2014 by pogowasright.org

Maria Dinzeo reports:

In a case with major implications for privacy in Internet communications, a federal judge heard arguments from Facebook and a class who claim the social network illegally scans private messages for content it can use for targeted advertising.

No case has ever claimed Facebook users have property rights as far as their Facebook messages are concerned. Until now.

Read more on Courthouse News.

Category: BusinessCourtFeatured NewsOnline

Post navigation

← Hacked celebs’ lawyers threaten to sue Google
Third Circuit gives narrow reading to exclusionary rule →

Now more than ever

Search

Contact Me

Email: [email protected]

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Categories

Recent Posts

  • The Markup caught 4 more states sharing personal health data with Big Tech
  • Privacy in the Big Sky State: Montana’s Consumer Privacy Law Gets Amended
  • UK Passes Data Use and Access Regulation Bill
  • Officials defend Liberal bill that would force hospitals, banks, hotels to hand over data
  • US Judge Invalidates Biden Rule Protecting Privacy for Abortions
  • DOJ’s Data Security Program: Key Compliance Considerations for Impacted Entities
  • 23andMe fined £2.31 million for failing to protect UK users’ genetic data

RSS Recent Posts on DataBreaches.net

  • McLaren provides written notice to 743,131 patients after ransomware attack in July 2024
  • A state forensics lab was leaking its files. Getting it locked down involved a number of people.
  • CoinMarketCap Hacked, Scrambles to Remove Malicious Wallet Verification Popup
  • Montana Attorney General launches investigation into Lee Enterprises data breach
  • AT&T gets preliminary approval for $177 million data breach settlement
©2025 PogoWasRight.org. All rights reserved.