PogoWasRight.org

Menu
  • About
  • Privacy
Menu

Georgia GOP’s DNA bill offends Bill of Rights

Posted on March 24, 2011July 3, 2025 by Dissent

Bob Barr comments on some state-level legislation in Georgia that is part of a disturbing national trend to permit law enforcement to take DNA samples from people who have been arrested. I’ve blogged about this type of legislation in the past. Most recently, North Carolina implemented this type of law and Senator Schumer is pushing for federal legislation to encourage states to do this.

Yet, darned if shortly after passage of the alcohol bill, the Senate moved on SB 80, sponsored by Sen. Joshua McKoon (R-Columbus) and backed by several of his Republican colleagues. This privacy-invasive, constitutionally-defective measure would authorize government agents to forcibly take a DNA sample from every person in Georgia who is arrested for a felony – not convicted, but merely arrested; and not just felonies for which DNA evidence is relevant, but for any felony.

If signed into law, this legislation would bring Georgia in line with two dozen other states and the federal government, by dramatically expanding the state’s DNA database. Through its enactment, this legislation would make Georgia yet another state in which the desire of law enforcement to gather as much information on as many people as possible, trumps the clear intent and purpose of the Constitution of the United States to protect citizens against unwarranted and unreasonable seizure of evidence against them.

Read more in The Barr Code. Obviously, I agree with Barr on this issue and view DNA collection as so privacy-intrusive that it should require the utmost Fourth Amendment protections.

No related posts.

Category: LawsSurveillance

Post navigation

← What’s Next for the FTC’s Proposed Privacy Framework?
Ca: Court says there’s no tort of invasion of privacy in Ontario →

Now more than ever

Search

Contact Me

Email: [email protected]

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Categories

Recent Posts

  • Australian law is now clearer about clinicians’ discretion to tell our patients’ relatives about their genetic risk
  • The ICO’s AI and biometrics strategy
  • Trump Border Czar Boasts ICE Can ‘Briefly Detain’ People Based On ‘Physical Appearance’
  • DeleteMyInfo Wins 2025 Digital Privacy Excellence Award from Internet Safety Council
  • TikTok Loses First Appeal Against £12.7M ICO Fine, Faces Second Investigation by DPC
  • German court offers EUR 5000 compensation for data breaches caused by Meta
  • How to Build on Washington’s “My Health, My Data” Act

RSS Recent Posts on DataBreaches.net

  • Back from the Brink: District Court Clears Air Regarding Individualized Damages Assessment in Data Breach Cases
  • Multiple lawsuits filed against Doyon Ltd over April 2024 data breach and late notification
  • Chinese hackers suspected in breach of powerful DC law firm
  • Qilin Emerged as The Most Active Group, Exploiting Unpatched Fortinet Vulnerabilities
  • CISA tags Citrix Bleed 2 as exploited, gives agencies a day to patch
©2025 PogoWasRight.org. All rights reserved.