PogoWasRight.org

Menu
  • About
  • Privacy
Menu

NH: Policy would violate voters’ privacy rights, create chaos

Posted on April 20, 2015June 30, 2025 by Dissent

An OpEd by Rep. David E. Cote in The Keene Sentinel describes a disturbing situation for New Hampshire voters who do not have photo IDs.

Cote (D-Nashua), who is the ranking Democrat and former chairman of the N.H. House Election Law Committee, explains:

Under a provision of New Hampshire’s photo ID law scheduled to take effect later this year, voters who show up to the polls without an approved photo ID are required to have their picture taken by an election official.

In an attempt to satisfy privacy and equal protection concerns for voters, the law enacted in 2012 contained specific requirements on how the picture-taking provision would be implemented. The election moderator or designee is required to take a photograph of the voter, “immediately” print and attach it to the voter’s affidavit form, and then delete the photograph from the camera in the presence of the voter.

To satisfy article 28-A of the N.H. Constitution, which requires new mandates on political subdivisions to be fully funded by the state, the secretary of state is required to provide each city and town with photography equipment and printing devices, along with instructions for their use in carrying out the picture-taking operation. The cost to equip each polling place with the necessary cameras and printers is estimated to be about $137,000 statewide.

When putting together their state budget proposal for this term, the Republican majority decided they didn’t want to pay for the equipment.

And once again, it seems, legislators’ ignorance of technology results in them brushing off the privacy concerns raised by election officials using their personal cell phones to take pictures of voters!

Read the whole OpEd on SentinelSource.com.

 

Related posts:

  • How Political Campaigns Use Your Phone’s Location to Target You
  • Did a Christian right-wing organization expose private details of millions of people?
Category: Laws

Post navigation

← Beyond Google: Here are four search engines that respect your privacy
Zurich admits snooping on private lives of borrowers →

Search

Contact Me

Email: info[at]pogowasright.org
Security Issue: security[at]pogowasright.org
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]pogowasright.org

Research Report of Note

A report by EPIC.org:

State Attorneys General & Privacy: Enforcement Trends, 2020-2024

Categories

Recent Posts

  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation
  • Who’s watching the watchers? This Mozilla fellow, and her Surveillance Watch map
  • EPIC Publishes New Whitepaper Detailing Privacy Risks of Government Data Mining Programs
  • Modern cars are spying on you. Here’s what you can do about it.
  • Attorney General James and Multistate Coalition Secure $5.1 Million from Education Software Company for Failing to Protect Students’ Data       
  • EU Parliament committee votes to advance controversial Europol data sharing proposal

RSS Recent Posts at DataBreaches.net

  • Short-term renewal of cyber information sharing law appears in bill to end shutdown
  • Yanluowang ransomware IAB pleads guilty
  • Lawsuit Alleges Ex-Intel Employee Hid 18,000 Sensitive Documents Prior to Leaving the Company
  • HIPAA, but for non-Covered Entities?
  • Manassas City Public Schools close on Monday due to cyberattack
©2025 PogoWasRight.org. All rights reserved.