PogoWasRight.org

Menu
  • About
  • Privacy
Menu

NZ: Privacy Commissioner’s decision in case where police disclosed man’s history of violence to current partner

Posted on March 19, 2021 by pogowasright.org

Case note 298110 [2021] NZPrivCmr 3: Police disclosed man’s history of violence to current partner

Police told the current girlfriend of a man that he had a history of violence, and that he had assaulted and threatened his ex-partner. The man complained to our office that his privacy had been breached, and the information disclosed by Police to his current girlfriend was wrong.

He said Police told his girlfriend that he had assaulted his previous partner and threatened to kill and rape her and her daughter. The man said he had only spat at his former partner and he disputed making the threats.

The man also said he was assaulted outside the local Police station and, when requested, Police had refused to give him video footage of the assault.

The man’s complaint raised issues under principles 6 and 11 of the Privacy Act.

Principle 6 says that an individual has a right to request access to information that identifies them, unless one of the withholding grounds in sections 27 to 29 of the Act (sections 50 to 53 of the Privacy Act 2020) applies.

Principle 11 says that an agency cannot disclose information it holds about an individual, unless one of the exceptions apply.

Read the findings and decision on the privacy commissioner’s web site.

 

Category: BreachesNon-U.S.

Post navigation

← NZ: Privacy commissioner’s findings in case where employer carried out belated background check
ePrivacy update: Comparison of the three EU drafts →

Now more than ever

Search

Contact Me

Email: [email protected]

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Categories

Recent Posts

  • Vermont signs Kids Code into law, faces legal challenges
  • Data Categories and Surveillance Pricing: Ferguson’s Nuanced Approach to Privacy Innovation
  • Anne Wojcicki Wins Bidding for 23andMe
  • Would you — or wouldn’t you?
  • New York passes a bill to prevent AI-fueled disasters
  • Synthetic Data and the Illusion of Privacy: Legal Risks of Using De-Identified AI Training Sets
  • States sue to block the sale of genetic data collected by DNA testing company 23andMe

RSS Recent Posts on DataBreaches.net

  • Credit Control Corporation data allegedly from 9.1 million consumers listed for sale on forum
  • Copilot AI Bug Could Leak Sensitive Data via Email Prompts
  • FTC Provides Guidance on Updated Safeguards Rule
  • Sentara Health terminates remote employees after realizing they couldn’t be sure who was doing the work.
  • Hackers Break Into Car Sharing App, 8.4 Million Users Affected
©2025 PogoWasRight.org. All rights reserved.