PogoWasRight.org

Menu
  • About
  • Privacy
Menu

Right to Information trumps privacy norms of Medical Council of India – Commission ruling

Posted on April 16, 2015June 30, 2025 by Dissent

Whoa. PTI reports:

The provisions of Medical Council of India to protect confidentiality in patients’ records cannot override statutes of Right to Information Act, Central Information Commission has held.

Information Commissioner Sridhar Acharyulu held that after RTI Act has come into being, any rules which are not in conformity with the disclosure norms will be overridden by the transparency law.

He said the decision to disclose records of a patient will be taken keeping in mind the provisions of the Right to Information Act.

This seems to be one of those cases where public safety might trump confidentiality provisions, but framing this as right to information trumping privacy concerns me. The ruling was made in the context of a case where a wife demanded her husband’s mental health records:

“The confidentiality required to be maintained in the medical records of a patient including a convict considering the regulations framed by the Medical Council of India cannot override the provisions of the Right to Information Act,” Acharyulu said while ordering disclosure of records of mental health of a person whose wife had demanded it.

It seems the wife was being beaten by the husband and had requested his records from the facility treating him, who had declined, citing confidentiality.

But does her situation really justify breaching his confidentiality by turning over his records? In India, is there a duty to warn or duty to protect that the facility could have used to disclose information to her if they felt she was at imminent risk of violence? And if they didn’t feel that there was anything they could disclose that would help her protect herself, should they have been required to disclose?

I find this case – and the broadness of the ruling – to be very concerning. I hope that mental health and other medical associations in India advocate to get this ruling overturned or at least seriously circumcised and the definition of “larger public interest” more clearly and narrowly defined.

You can read the original article on iGovernment. You can find the text of the Right to Information Act here.

No related posts.

Category: BreachesFeatured NewsHealthcare

Post navigation

← Privacy policies and Security– can we get it right???
Hampden Wilbraham Regional School Committee says NO to giving PARCC access to students’ social media accounts →

Search

Contact Me

Email: info[at]pogowasright.org
Security Issue: security[at]pogowasright.org
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]pogowasright.org

Research Report of Note

A report by EPIC.org:

State Attorneys General & Privacy: Enforcement Trends, 2020-2024

Categories

Recent Posts

  • Modern cars are spying on you. Here’s what you can do about it.
  • Attorney General James and Multistate Coalition Secure $5.1 Million from Education Software Company for Failing to Protect Students’ Data       
  • EU Parliament committee votes to advance controversial Europol data sharing proposal
  • DHS offers “disturbing new excuses” to seize kids’ biometric data, expert says
  • California Adds Injunctive Relief to its Right of Publicity Statute and Extends Liability to Digital Replicas
  • DHS Gives Local Cops a Facial Recognition App To Find Immigrants
  • Phone location data of top EU officials for sale, report finds

RSS Recent Posts at DataBreaches.net

  • NCCIA arrests man over massive data breach involving millions of Pakistanis
  • Defense Contractors Are Silencing Their Cybersecurity Watchdogs
  • Fourth Circuit Weighs in on Standing in Data Breach Class Actions
  • ALT5 Sigma sues former consultant over alleged data breach
  • Is your cyberinsurance paid up? Are you sure?
©2025 PogoWasRight.org. All rights reserved.