PogoWasRight.org

Menu
  • About
  • Privacy
Menu

Twitter ruling disappoints, but doesn’t surprise privacy advocates

Posted on July 6, 2012 by pogowasright.org

More reactions to the Twitter ruling that denied a user standing to challenge a subpoena to produce his records. Jaikumar Vijayan reports:

… The court rejected Harris’ claims because the data sought by prosecutors belonged to Twitter, not him. The court asserted that Harris therefore had no standing to challenge the subpoena.

Read the reactions from EPIC and other privacy advocates on Computerworld.

Category: CourtOnlineU.S.

Post navigation

← A Moment to Celebrate: No Data Retention Mandate in Smith’s New Child Protection Bill
Court: Cops can read suspect’s texts, spring text trap →

Now more than ever

Search

Contact Me

Email: [email protected]

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Categories

Recent Posts

  • Anne Wojcicki Wins Bidding for 23andMe
  • Would you — or wouldn’t you?
  • New York passes a bill to prevent AI-fueled disasters
  • Synthetic Data and the Illusion of Privacy: Legal Risks of Using De-Identified AI Training Sets
  • States sue to block the sale of genetic data collected by DNA testing company 23andMe
  • AI tools collect and store data about you from all your devices – here’s how to be aware of what you’re revealing
  • 23andMe Privacy Ombudsman Urges User Consent Pre-Data Sale

RSS Recent Posts on DataBreaches.net

  • WestJet investigates cyberattack disrupting internal systems
  • Plastic surgeons often store nude photos of patients with their identity information. When would we call that “negligent?”
  • India: Servers of two city hospitals hacked; police register FIR
  • Ph: Coop Hospital confirms probe into reported cyberattack
  • Slapped wrists for Financial Conduct Authority staff who emailed work data home
©2025 PogoWasRight.org. All rights reserved.