PogoWasRight.org

Menu
  • About
  • Privacy
Menu

UK: Reactiv Media not only loses appeal, but get slapped with steeper penalty

Posted on April 14, 2015June 30, 2025 by Dissent

Last year, the U.K.’s Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) levied a monetary penalty against Reactiv Media for violating the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations (PECR), which is the U.K.’s version of our  Do-Not-Call regulations.

Reactiv Media appealed the penalty and wound up with an even steeper penalty. As the I.C.O. reports:

Today the Information Rights Tribunal overturned an appeal by Reactiv Media Limited against one of our civil monetary penalties. In fact the Tribunal increased the penalty from £50,000 to £75,000.

In July last year we served Reactiv Media Limited with the fine for making unsolicited marketing calls to people on the Telephone Preference Service (TPS). The TPS had received 481 complaints and we had received 120.

The Tribunal not only agreed with us that the fine was justified but stated there was evidence that showed ‘a culture of denial and minimisation of the breach, weak governance of the company and a tendency to blame others rather than accept responsibility’. Due to the case’s aggravating factors the Tribunal was satisfied the larger penalty was more appropriate.

I wouldn’t be surprised if this outcome makes entities less likely to appeal future monetary penalties issued by the ICO.

No related posts.

Category: BreachesBusinessNon-U.S.

Post navigation

← Oregon House unanimously passes bill to protect confidentiality of sexual-assault survivors
Irish woman at center of US rape case ‘was followed after leaving court’ →

Search

Contact Me

Email: info[at]pogowasright.org
Security Issue: security[at]pogowasright.org
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]pogowasright.org

Research Report of Note

A report by EPIC.org:

State Attorneys General & Privacy: Enforcement Trends, 2020-2024

Categories

Recent Posts

  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation
  • Who’s watching the watchers? This Mozilla fellow, and her Surveillance Watch map
  • EPIC Publishes New Whitepaper Detailing Privacy Risks of Government Data Mining Programs
  • Modern cars are spying on you. Here’s what you can do about it.

RSS Recent Posts at DataBreaches.net

  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
©2025 PogoWasRight.org. All rights reserved.